China ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ is the World's Propaganda Factory

Note:

This was originally written Monday September 11, 2023. I don't really remember what prompted me to write this, what was going through my head, but I just felt like writing about China ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ, and also Taiwan ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ผ. This is apart of a series that I wrote about China ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ and Taiwan ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ผ. The first two are about China ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ, and then the last two are about Taiwan ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ผ. There's also an unofficial fourth entry that I wrote about China ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ's opinions on North Korea ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ต and what it's relationship with North Korea ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ต actually is, but it's mostly just these posts and they're mostly just about China ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ and Taiwan ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ผ respectively. And since I finished posting my series on Israel ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ, Palestine ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ธ, Hamas, and Iran ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ท, I thought I would go ahead and post these since I haven't posted anything political or historical in the past couple of weeks. 

All of the stuff I've posted in the last couple of weeks have all been about entertainment, movies, TV shows, and cartoons. One of them was about an episode of a National Geographic series from the 1990s about a talking Earth ๐ŸŒŽ teaching you about the animals of the world using the best stock footage and public domain music that Nat Geo has available. In that case, it was about dinosaurs ๐Ÿฆ–๐Ÿฆ• and also insects ๐Ÿชฐ๐Ÿœ๐Ÿชฒ, arachnids ๐Ÿ•ท️, and bats ๐Ÿฆ‡. 

In addition to this, of all the political and historical stuff I've posted on this blog, I haven't really posted anything on Asia. The only Asia related posts I've posted on here in my Politics and History categories is the one I wrote about Myanmar ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฒ and the civil war going on there, and the complicated and messy history behind all of it, and the one that I posted about the Vietnam War ๐Ÿ‡ป๐Ÿ‡ณ, and an alternate history scenario in-which South Vietnam and its anti-communist allies won the war instead of North Vietnam ๐Ÿ‡ป๐Ÿ‡ณ and its communist allies ☭. 

All of the other ones have either about Africa or the Middle East. All of the Africa ones I posted were about Liberia ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡ท and the two brutal civil wars that happened there, and the all of the Mideast ones I posted were about the on-going situation in Israel ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ and Gaza, and in the Red Sea and Yemen ๐Ÿ‡พ๐Ÿ‡ช with the Houthis. I really didn't write that much about the Houthi situation, like I didn't write anything specifically dedicated to it and posted it on here. The most I've written about the situation in the Red Sea involving the Houthis is in the note for the last entry in the Israel-Hamas war ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ series where I mentioned just the current developments that had happened, all the stuff that I knew at the time that I wrote that note. 

Basically, the Iranian-backed ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ท Houthis started launching attacks on shipping in the Red Sea in response to the Israel-Hamas war ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ in Gaza from Yemen ๐Ÿ‡พ๐Ÿ‡ช, a country that has been in a civil war since 2014, a civil war that was largely instigated by the Houthis themselves who took the capital, Sanaa, and have held onto it since. The Houthis claimed that they were just attacking Israeli shipping ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ, but in reality, they were attacking American shipping ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ and then European shipping ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡บ and Asian shipping. Since the United States ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ had already sent aircraft carrier strike groups to the Mediterranean Sea and the Red Sea in response to the war in Gaza, it was them that began retaliating against the Houthis. 

Then, the US ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ built a coalition of many other countries, mostly from Europe, but also a couple from Asia, one from Oceania, one from Africa, one from the Middle East, and another one from North America, and began conducting a military operation to defend the shipping lanes in the Red Sea from further Houthi attacks, an operation they call Operation Prosperity Guardian. Now, when I saw the name of that operation, I genuinely thought that it said Operation Prosperity Garden, and I had wrote that initially when I wrote the note for the last Israel-Hamas war ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ post. But, then I looked at it again on Wikipedia, and it was actually Operation Prosperity Guardian ๐Ÿ˜…. I don't know if I misread it or if someone on Wikipedia messed up and put Garden instead of Guardian. But, it's Operation Prosperity Guardian, not Operation Prosperity Garden. I corrected it on on the other note, but still. 

If that wasn't enough, the Wikipedia page also kept adding countries to the belligerents list, such as Germany ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช, New Zealand ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฟ, and South Korea ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ท, and I edited the note a few times to add those countries since there were apart of the belligerents list on the coalition side. But, then a day or so later, those countries were removed from the list, and I had to go back and remove them. So, as of now, the official list of members in the US-lead coalition ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ is the United Kingdom ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง, Greece ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ท, Norway ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ด, the Netherlands ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฑ, Denmark ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ฐ, Canada ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ, Australia ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ, Singapore ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฌ, Sri Lanka ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡ฐ, Bahrain ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ญ, and the Seychelles ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡จ in a purely support role.

It's like a larger scale, more souped up version of Operation Ocean Shield, the military operation in-which the US ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ put together an international coalition to stop Somali pirate attacks ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ด๐Ÿด‍☠️ in the Gulf of Aden. The Somali Civil War ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ด had caused many Somalis ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ด to turn to piracy ๐Ÿด‍☠️ in order to make a living. It's almost as if civil wars happening in countries that border international shipping lanes and choke points is a bad thing. Except, here in this case, the Houthis' reasoning for attacking shipping in the Red Sea is not the same as the Somali pirates' ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ด๐Ÿด‍☠️ reasoning for attacking shipping (or raiding shipping) in the Gulf of Aden. 

The Houthis are mostly motivated by politics, and are not just in it for the money ๐Ÿ’ต๐Ÿ’ถ๐Ÿ’ท like the Somali pirates ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ด๐Ÿด‍☠️ were ๐Ÿค‘. They're trying to show off, show their allegiance and "solidarity" with the Palestinian cause ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ธ when Israel ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ is bombing the shit out of Gaza. That's not to say there isn't a money ๐Ÿ’ต๐Ÿ’ถ๐Ÿ’ท component to this, there is, but the Houthis' motive for attacking international shipping has more to do with politics, and them wanting to virtue signal for lack of a better term. 

I also think the coalition for Operation Prosperity Guardian is a lot smaller than the coalition for Operation Ocean Shield. Ocean Shield was a straight up NATO operation, whereas this isn't, since it features a few non-NATO countries along with all the NATO ones, which are the majority. That's not to say that non-NATO countries didn't participate in Ocean Shield, they did, but it featured a lot of NATO countries (including most of the ones involved in Prosperity Guardian right now) and the operation was still largely conducted as a NATO operation. Prosperity Guardian isn't being conducted as a NATO operation like Ocean Shield was, it's mostly being conducted as a US operation ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ where the US ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ works with some partners.  

I say that Prosperity Guardian is larger in scale than Ocean Shield because while it features less countries in the coalition, the weapons and  equipment that the enemy, the Houthis have at their disposal are far more powerful and destructive than anything the Somali pirates ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ด๐Ÿด‍☠️ had. Like, the Houthis straight up have helicopters that they use to board ships with, whereas the Somali pirates ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ด๐Ÿด‍☠️ only had fishing boats ๐Ÿšค basically. All of the Houthis' weapons and equipment come courtesy of Iran ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ท because they are an Iranian proxy group ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ท. 

I mean, they aren't just an Iranian proxy ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ท, they do have agency and make decisions on their own. But, they are more of an Iranian proxy ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ท than Hamas is, since they are actually Shia whereas Hamas is Sunni. That's an important distinction to make because Iran ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ท is a Shia theocracy, and it tends to sponsor groups that are also Shia. So, if an Islamic militant group ☪️ is Shia, then it's probably backed by Iran ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ท. Hamas is the exception, one of the few if only, Sunni organization being supported by Iran ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ท.

The situation right now as far as Prosperity Guardian and the Red Sea crisis as a whole goes is that the US ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ and the UK ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง has launched airstrikes against Houthi bases and Houthi positions in Yemen ๐Ÿ‡พ๐Ÿ‡ช, which has of course sparked huge backlash and protests ๐Ÿชง in Yemen ๐Ÿ‡พ๐Ÿ‡ช. I mean, why wouldn't there be? The Yemenis ๐Ÿ‡พ๐Ÿ‡ช have been bombed by the Saudis ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฆ for the past 9 years, and they got a lot of their bombs from the Americans ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ. They don't want to be bomb again, this time by the Americans ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ and the British ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง. Even though, as far as I know, no civilians were actually killed in the US and UK strikes ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง on Yemen ๐Ÿ‡พ๐Ÿ‡ช. 

Right now, it's just a brutal back and forth between the coalition and the Houthis, with the Houthis attacking US forces ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ in the Red Sea, and the US ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ retaliating with strikes of its own. They are no closer to defeating the Houthis. Completely defeating and destroying a group like the Houthis is close to impossible, and that's not even the Biden administration's goal with this operation. Their goal is to deter the Houthis from attacking international shipping any further by showing what happens if they keep doing what they're doing. And what happens is that they get blown up ๐Ÿ’ฅ by American and British missiles and bombs ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง. Whether any of this will work in the long run is still up in the air, and we'll just have to wait and see what happens next.

Of course, this is all happening within the broader context of attacks on US forces ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ in both Iraq ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ถ and Syria ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡พ by other Iranian proxies ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ท. Last month, in December 2023, the US ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ launched airstrikes against a Shia militia group that had carried out a drone attack against US forces ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ stationed in northern Iraq ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ถ, the Kurdish dominated region specifically. The US ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ also has military forces in the Kurdish majority region in northern Syria ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡พ as well, since the US ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ supported the Kurdish militias in both northern Iraq ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ถ and northern Syria ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡พ during the Syrian Civil War ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡พ and the war against ISIS specifically. 

Which had started in Syria ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡พ during the civil war, and then expanded to Iraq ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ถ, and eventually the entire world as countries in Europe, Asia, and Africa had joined the US ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ in the fight against ISIS since ISIS had expanded its territory to Iraq ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ถ as well as Syria ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡พ. They even expanded to Africa in places like Libya ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡พ, Algeria ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ฟ, the Democratic Republic of the Congo ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฉ, Mozambique ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฟ, Uganda ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฌ, Mali ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฑ, Niger ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ช, Burkina Faso ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ซ, Egypt ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ฌ, Nigeria ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฌ, Cameroon ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฒ, and Chad ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ฉ. 

They also expanded to the Northern Caucasus region in Russia ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ in Chechnya and Dagestan, which is why ISIS attacked Russia ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ during this time, and why Russia ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ was against ISIS. They technically joined the fight against ISIS, but they did it on their own terms, and didn't not help the US ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ in its efforts. In fact, Russia ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ was working against the US ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ and its interests during the war against ISIS because instead of focusing on destroying ISIS in Syria ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡พ, the Russians ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ mainly focused on helping the Assad regime destroy the pro-democracy opposition, the secular anti-Assad pro-democracy rebels. They focused more on propping up the Assad regime, and saving Bashar al-Assad's ass than eliminating ISIS targets in the country. Russia ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ's fight against ISIS was mainly focused on the Northern Caucasus region because it was happening within their own country, their own territory, and they were also still in the middle of fighting the Second Chechen War. 

So, the only groups that the US ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ could rely on to help them fight against ISIS besides their NATO allies were the Kurds, the Kurdish militias, the ones that Turkey ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ท doesn't like. And it was ultimately the Kurds that cleared northern Syria ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡พ of ISIS militants, they were the ones who liberated Raqqa from ISIS. Not Assad's forces, and not any of Islamic militants opposed to ISIS, and even the pro-democracy rebels. It was the Kurds, and that's why the US ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ supports them, much to the chagrin of the Turks ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ท.

ISIS even spread to Iran ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ท itself, and Afghanistan ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ซ, where they began fighting the Taliban, and have been fighting the Taliban ever since, even after the Taliban seized back control of Afghanistan ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ซ and are the de facto government now. ISIS truly was a global threat during the 2010s, and they arguably are even to this day, though not as much as their heyday in the mid 2010s. Iran ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ท had to deal with an ISIS attack recently in the city of Kerman, during a commemoration event marking the 4 year anniversary of the death of Qasem Soleimani, the IRGC general that the US ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ had killed with an airstrike in Iraq ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ถ back in 2020. Iran ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ท even retaliated against ISIS for the attack in Kerman with airstrikes in Iraq ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ถ, Syria ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡พ, and even Pakistan ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฐ that the US ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ described as "reckless." 

Like I said in a note in a previous post, Iraq ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ถ and Syria ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡พ have both become places where countries bomb terrorists and militias that they don't like. And I guess Yemen ๐Ÿ‡พ๐Ÿ‡ช is also joining that category, what with how many times that country has been bombed by Saudi Arabia ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฆ and its allies, the United Arab Emirates ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ช, Bahrain ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ญ, Qatar ๐Ÿ‡ถ๐Ÿ‡ฆ, Egypt ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ฌ, Jordan ๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ด, and Morocco ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฆ. And now, the US ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ and the UK ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง have joined the group of countries that have bombed Yemen ๐Ÿ‡พ๐Ÿ‡ช to kill terrorists or militia groups they don’t like, in this case, the Houthis, who the Saudis ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฆ were also mainly targeting in their military intervention in the Yemeni Civil War ๐Ÿ‡พ๐Ÿ‡ช. 

That's not to say that the US ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ hasn't struck Yemen ๐Ÿ‡พ๐Ÿ‡ช before in the past. They've struck Yemen ๐Ÿ‡พ๐Ÿ‡ช numerous time before the War on Terror and during the War on Terror against al-Qaeda, who has had foothold in Yemen ๐Ÿ‡พ๐Ÿ‡ช since 1998. Don't forget, the al-Qaeda attack on the USS Cole in 2000 happened off the coast of Yemen ๐Ÿ‡พ๐Ÿ‡ช and it was carried out by al-Qaeda from Yemen ๐Ÿ‡พ๐Ÿ‡ช. Since the beginning of the 21st century, and there has not been time when the US ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ has not conducted some sort of airstrike on Yemen ๐Ÿ‡พ๐Ÿ‡ช.

It's just that now, the US ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ is targeting the Houthis, a group that they really didn't pay that much attention to until the Yemeni Civil War ๐Ÿ‡พ๐Ÿ‡ช happened, and the US ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ supported Saudi Arabia ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฆ's intervention in the war by supplying them with weapons. Most of, if not all of Saudi Arabia ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฆ's military weaponry and equipment is from the US ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ. And the Houthis are not a new group, you know, they didn't just emerge from the civil war. They've been around since the 1990s. They emerged in 1994, and have been active inside Yemen ๐Ÿ‡พ๐Ÿ‡ช ever since. Now, they've become an international problem, not just a Yemeni problem ๐Ÿ‡พ๐Ÿ‡ช. And now, because of the civil war, and the Houthis, al-Qaeda, and ISIS specifically, Yemen ๐Ÿ‡พ๐Ÿ‡ช has become yet another Middle Eastern country that's bombed by outside powers to eliminate terrorists or militias, any non-state actor that they consider a threat or a nuisance.

It's not even just the US ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ, the UK ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง, Iran ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ท, Saudi Arabia ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฆ, and Russia ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ that do this, it's also Turkey ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ท, who has bombed both Iraq ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ถ and Syria ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡พ on more than one occasion, including three months ago in October, when the Kurdish political party/militia/terrorist group called the PKK (Kurdistan Workers' Party) committed a terrorist attack against Turkey ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ท, in its capital, Ankara, and Turkey ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ท bombed both Iraq ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ถ and Syria ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡พ in response. The US ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ also accidentally shot down a Turkish drone ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ท that was taking part in those retaliatory strikes. This all happened the same week that the Hamas attack on Israel ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ on October 7 happened, just a few days before it happened. 

Even the UAE ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ช has sort engaged in some questionable behavior during the Yemeni Civil War ๐Ÿ‡พ๐Ÿ‡ช, as the Emirati government ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ช began hiring mercenaries, American mercenaries ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ specifically, to carry out assassinations against people who they claimed were terrorists, but were often politicians or political activists that were apart of political movements that the Emiratis ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ช didn't like and saw as a threat, such as the Muslim Brotherhood, an Islamist movement and organization ☪️ that exists in countries in the Middle East and North Africa like Egypt ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ฌ, Bahrain ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ญ, Turkey ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ท, Iran ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ท (sort of), Iraq ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ถ, Jordan ๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ด, Qatar ๐Ÿ‡ถ๐Ÿ‡ฆ, Kuwait ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ผ, Saudi Arabia ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฆ, Syria ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡พ, Algeria ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ฟ, the UAE ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ช itself, Libya ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡พ, Mauritania ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ท, Morocco ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฆ, Sudan ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฉ, Tunisia ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ณ, Israel ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ (sort of), Palestine ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ธ of course (Hamas is an off-shoot of the Muslim Brotherhood), and of course, Yemen ๐Ÿ‡พ๐Ÿ‡ช itself. Something that got those American mercenaries ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ in trouble. They were arrested and charged with war crimes for participating in extrajudicial killings against civilians in a foreign country. Basically, helping the Emiratis ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ช kill their political enemies in Yemen ๐Ÿ‡พ๐Ÿ‡ช under the guise of counterterrorism. But, the mercs insist that they're innocent, and that they didn't do anything wrong, and that they did kill actual terrorists. The BBC did a video about it, you can go check out.

But, anyway, I've talked enough about this. The point is that all of the political stuff I've posted on the blog so far has been about what's happening in the Middle East, and that's where most of the world's attention is at, and what all the headlines are about. I know that I veered off course into a tangent about terrorism, but to be fair, the Chinese government ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ did use terrorism as an excuse to crackdown on the Uyghurs in Xinjiang, and subjugate them, persecute them, erase their identity and culture, and ultimately bring them to heel. Which they have successfully done, unfortunately. Xinjiang is now a shell of its former self, and has been thoroughly been Sinicized. 

The Uyghurs have been forced to dress and act more "Chinese," and are being purposefully outpopulated by Han Chinese. It's an official government official to encourage more Han Chinese people to move into Xinjiang, and replace the Uyghurs as the majority. The Uyghur language has been replaced by Mandarin as the dominant language in the region, and Xinjiang as a whole has pretty much been turned into a tourist destination where Chinese people ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ and foreigners are given a very sanitized, Disneyfied, and government approved version of Uyghur culture and history. 

Speaking of Disney, what makes the whole Uyghur situation even worse is that a company like Disney was complicit in it, willingly filming the live action Mulan movie next to the very concentration camps that the Chinese government ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ has detained thousands, if not, millions of Uyghurs in, and thanking the government bureau or department in charge of running those concentration camps. This was a case where evil had prevailed, and the entire rest of the world allowed it prevail. Now, let's talk about how Chinese propaganda ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ is bad, and China ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ produces propaganda for other besides itself. 

 

— 

 

 

(This is the flag of the People's Republic of China ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ, the current ruling government in mainland China.) 
 

China ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ is not just the world's factory when it comes to consumer goods, they're also the world's factory when it comes to propaganda as well. They not only produce propaganda for their own country, but they also produce propaganda for Russia ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ, North Korea ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ต, Iran ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ท, Syria ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡พ, Venezuela ๐Ÿ‡ป๐Ÿ‡ช, Belarus ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡พ, Myanmar ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฒ, Afghanistan ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ซ (under Taliban control), and of course, Cuba ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡บ.

Any country that's authoritarian and is friendly with Beijing, they will produce propaganda for them, praising them, making them look as good as possible, while making western countries like the US ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ, the UK ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง, France ๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท, Germany ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช, Canada ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ, and Australia ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ, and western aligned countries like Japan ๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ต, South Korea ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ท, Ukraine ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ, India ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ (sort of), and Taiwan ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ผ look as bad as possible. And a lot of this propaganda is not targeted at the domestic Chinese audience ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ, but it is in fact targeted at western audience, trying to convince them that their own countries are bad, while China ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ is good.

China ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ's perfectly innocent, it's not trying to do anything bad, it's not threatening its neighbors with military force or economic coercion, it's not committing a genocide within its borders. China ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ's only using its power to make the world a better place, and everyone benefits from a China ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ that's on top of the world. Not the US ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ, the US ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ is inherently evil empire that's making the world a more chaotic and violent place by meddling in everyone's affairs, forcing everyone to do things their way or the highway, and trying to be the world's police. They lie, cheat, and steal, they cannot be trusted under circumstance. Not like China ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ, China ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ can totally be trusted, in fact, they're the only country you should trust. That's the basic message of a lot of this Chinese propaganda ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ.

Or when something happens in the world, especially in Africa or Asia, China ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ not only tries to take advantage of it, but also propagandizes about it, and trying to find a way to make it the West's fault. Like, they were one of the first governments in the world to recognize the Taliban after they took control of Afghanistan ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ซ in 2021, and have used their propaganda apparatuses and their simps in the West try to rehabilitate the Taliban's image, and try to make them look good, friendly, and peaceful (and not like the terrorists that they are), and make the war seem like nothing more than Western aggression towards an innocent little country in Central Asia. All so that Chinese firms ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ can gain mining concessions ⛏️ for Afghanistan ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ซ's vast natural resources.

 

 

(This is the flag of the Taliban.)

 


The Taliban have indeed welcomed Chinese companies ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ into the country, and have allowed them mine for gold, copper, iron ore, barite, lithium, chromite, lead, talc, zinc, as well as precious and semi-precious stones. The USGS ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ has estimated that Afghanistan ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ซ has about $1 trillion ๐Ÿ’ต worth of untapped minerals, and China ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ now has near unlimited access to it. Some of these minerals are necessary to making electrical wiring, semi-conductors, and smartphone batteries, mainly iron ore, copper, and lithium.

They also want access to the oil ๐Ÿ›ข️ and natural gas ๐Ÿ”ฅ that's in the country as well; BTW oil production ๐Ÿ›ข️ in Afghanistan ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ซ only began in late 2012, so no, the War in Afghanistan ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ซ was not over oil ๐Ÿ›ข️ like some overly conspiratorial anti-American leftists ๐Ÿšซ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ have suggested over the years since the invasion in 2001 ๐Ÿ™„; anyone who says the War in Afghanistan ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ซ was over oil ๐Ÿ›ข️ is an idiot ๐Ÿ˜ค!; even then, Afghanistan ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ซ is still not one of the top oil producers ๐Ÿ›ข️ in the world, I don't think it's even in the top 10.

They defended the Omar al-Bashir regime in Sudan ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฉ when they were being accused of war crimes and genocide in Darfur. And I wouldn't be surprised if China ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ has also tried using the current civil war in Sudan ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฉ to its advantage, and not only supports the government forces over the RSF, but has propagandized about it and tried to make the whole thing the West's fault or make it seem like the West wants to intervene, even though they don't.

They supported the Kazakh government ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ฟ when all those anti-government and pro-democracy protests ๐Ÿชง were going on in early 2022, saying in their propaganda channels that the whole thing was a Western attempt to destabilize Kazakhstan ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ฟ and overthrow the government there ๐Ÿ™„; you know, the same BS Russia ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ always says whenever protests ๐Ÿชง happen in a post-Soviet country that has a friendly government to them. And they of course Russia ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ's actions in helping the Kazakh government ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ฟ put down the protests ๐Ÿชง; something that Russia ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ used its military alliance, CSTO to do. 

 

(This is the flag of the CSTO, Collective Security Treaty Organization, Russia ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ's answer to NATO. This is a pretty small and toothless military organization that only includes the likes of Belarus ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡พ, Armenia ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ฒ, Kazakhstan ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ฟ, Tajikistan ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ฏ, and Kyrgyzstan ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ฌ, the countries that coincidentally are the only ones left in the post-Soviet space that are still on good terms with Russia ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ. They have taken part in very few military operations as an alliance, and one of those was putting down the anti-government protests ๐Ÿชง in Kazakhstan ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ฟ, a member of the alliance. 

It's sort of like the Warsaw Pact in that way. The only real military operation the Warsaw Pact conducted was the 1968 invasion of Czechoslovakia ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฟ, called Operation Danube, where they invaded Czechoslovakia ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฟ just to stop the country from liberalizing. And just like how the Warsaw Pact of the Cold War didn't join the Soviet Union ☭ in its invasion of Afghanistan ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ซ, none of the CSTO members joined Russia ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ in its invasion of Ukraine ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ, and indeed, Russia ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ didn't invoke Article 4 to justify a CSTO invasion of Ukraine ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ, and just decided to invade Ukraine ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ itself. Article 4 BTW is the CSTO's equivalent to NATO's Article 5. Most people agree that the CSTO wouldn't actually stand a chance in a fight against NATO. The military imbalance is just way too great, and NATO would easily decimate the CSTO in a war between the two. 

That is if CSTO even still exists by the time war breaks out between NATO and Russia ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ, if one ever breaks out. Since many of the other member states are starting to doubt the validity and the viability of the alliance given that they've all seen Russia ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ's dismal performance in the war in Ukraine ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ, and their inability to conquer the entire country, or even take the capital city, Kyiv. And also because Russia ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ has failed to live up to its security commitments to the other member states, largely because of the invasion of Ukraine ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ. Especially Armenia ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ฒ, who is pissed at Russia ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ for failing to stop the Azerbaijani advance ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ฟ into Nagorno-Karabakh back in September 2023. So, this organization, this alliance could easily fall apart in the next few years, thanks to Putin's decision to invade Ukraine ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ.)

 



They've supported and defended the Assad regime in Syria ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡พ on multiple occasions during the Syrian Civil War ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡พ, and supported Russia ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ's actions during that war; which included indiscriminate bombings of Syrian cities ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡พ like Aleppo, and killing and abusing civilians; some of those war crimes were committed the Russian mercenary company ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ, Wagner Group. They've accused the West (mainly the US ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ) of plotting to overthrow Bashar al-Assad just like they did Saddam Hussein in Iraq ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ถ.

They've even dismissed the claims that Assad has used chemical weapons ☣️ against the opposition forces and against civilians during the war, even though there's mountains of evidence support the claims that he did, and they have given credence to conspiracy theories that the whole thing was made up by the West to vilify Assad and justify an Iraq-style invasion ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ถ; none of which is true. I mean, Barack Obama was trying everything he could to AVOID intervening in Syria ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡พ because he didn't want to break his campaign promise of not intervening in the Middle East, and because he didn't want to be compared to George W. Bush and make the same mistakes he made.

He didn't even enforce his own red lines when Assad violated them; and in the end, he only deployed a thousand troops; not exactly what I would call a full scale invasion. Even then, the main point of the intervention was fighting ISIS, not Assad and a lot of the coalition fighting was done through airstrikes, not with ground forces, although ground forces did do quite a bit.

Obama again went out of his way to make sure the US forces ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ and the coalition did not go after Assad's forces, and only focused on attacking ISIS and other Islamic militant groups ☪️ in the country during the war, although they did also go after Hezbollah, an Iranian-backed Shia militia group and political party ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ท based in Lebanon ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡ง; most of the strikes against Assad's forces during the war happened during the Trump administration and only a few during Obama's.

BTW, US forces ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ did engage the Wagner Group on multiple occasions in Syria ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡พ during the war, and I think they even killed some of them; making this one of the few times in history where Americans ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ have fought Russians ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ directly on a battlefield, in an active war zone, even if said Russians ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ were not an official part of the Russian military ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ. Despite this though, the Wagner Group is not officially recognized by the US government ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ as a terrorist organization, only as a criminal organization (which, yeah, they are too); they are recognized as a terrorist organization by France ๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท, Estonia ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ช, Lithuania ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡น, Ukraine ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ, and the OSCE Parliamentary Assembly.

They've also defended the military junta in Myanmar ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฒ after they carried out a coup against the government of Aung San Suu Kyi in 2021, and after the military junta was accused of committing war crimes and genocide against the various ethnic groups in the country (again); dismissing those claims as "Western propaganda"; how typical ๐Ÿ™„; it really isn't surprising that China ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ defends genocidal regimes like those in Myanmar ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฒ or Sudan ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฉ (before the coup) considering they're doing the same thing on their own territory.

They've also supported and defended Russia ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ's involvement in the Central African Civil War ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ซ, even though Russia ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ's involvement was mainly through the Wagner Group. But, the Wagner Group was spreading Russian influence ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ, and carrying out Russian interests ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ in the Central African Republic ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ซ, and in other African countries, including Mali ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฑ, Guinea ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ณ, Burkina Faso ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ซ, Mozambique ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฟ, and Niger ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ช.

Speaking of which, in addition to supporting violent and kleptocratic regimes and dictators and denying war crimes and genocide, I would not be surprised if China ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ and its army of simps in the West have also produced propaganda supporting the various coups in West Africa over the past year or so, even if a lot of those coup plotters and coup supporters were pro-Russian ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ; the only exception or odd one out is Gabon ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ฆ; the military has not voiced any pro-Russian opinions ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ, nor have any of the coup supporters to my knowledge; plus, I do think that China ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ and Russia ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ both supported the Ali Bongo Ondimba regime, so I'm not even sure if they're okay with the coup or not. But, China ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ still supports anything that's pro-Russian ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ because anything pro-Russian ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ is pro-Chinese ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ by proxy, and China ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ is just okay with anything that's anti-western in general.

Speaking of which, there also tends to be a lot of overlap between China simps ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ and Russia simps ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ, like you can't be a contrarian Westerner simping for China ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ, while not also be simping for Russia ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ; you kind of have to simp for both. A lot Chinese talking points ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ are also Russian talking points ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ because the Chinese government ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ, the Chinese Communist Party ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ☭,  supports the Putin regime, Xi Jinping supports Putin.

They have stood by Russia ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ throughout their invasion of Ukraine ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ, amplifying Russian talking points ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ; all the BS post-hoc justifications for the invasion like how it was all about NATO, or how Ukraine ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ was persecuting Russian speakers and ethnic Russians in Donbas, or how there are bio-labs ☣️ in Ukraine ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ producing biological and chemical weapons ☣️ ๐Ÿ™„; which is pretty ironic considering they defended Assad's use of chemical weapons ☣️, making excuses for him, and saying that he never used anyway, despite the countless evidence saying otherwise ๐Ÿ˜’; now they're using chemical and biological weapons ☣️ as a BS post hoc casus belli for Russia ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ's invasion of Ukraine ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ, shame China ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ, shame; they're doing the very thing they accused the Americans ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ of doing with Assad, which is lying about chemical weapons ☣️ to justify a war.

It's all the more ironic when you consider that China supporters ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ in the West have made false accusations about the US ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ lying about chemical and biological weapons ☣️ in China ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ during the COVID-19 pandemic ๐Ÿฆ ๐Ÿ˜ท. I remember this one guy ♂︎, Daniel Dumbrill was saying this in one of his videos during the pandemic ๐Ÿ˜ท that the US ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ was falsifying intelligence about China ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ possessing weapons of mass destruction (WMDs) like chemical and biological weapons ☣️ in Shenzhen or Shanghai or some other Chinese city ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ in the southern or eastern part of the country. Like, he said that the US ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ was saying that the Chinese government ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ was developing WMDs there inside one of these factories. And he said that reason why the US ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ was doing this was to justify an Iraq-style invasion ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ถ ๐Ÿคฆ‍♂️.

Yes, these people really do just keep bringing up the Iraq War ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ถ in order to discredit any American criticism ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ towards China ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ, or American concern ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ about China ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ ๐Ÿ™„ because it's the only thing they really have. It's the one war that they can point to (besides the Vietnam War ๐Ÿ‡ป๐Ÿ‡ณ) as an example of unjustifiable war of aggression by the US ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ, or as an example of American imperialism ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ; American leaders ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ lying about a country to cynically start a war over natural resources or to assert American dominance ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ. If it's not Iraq ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ถ, then it's Libya ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡พ, and if it's not Libya ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡พ, it's Syria ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡พ, and if it's not Syria ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡พ, then it's Panama ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฆ.

But, the US invasion of Panama ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฆ was so long ago, and has largely been forgotten that most of these people don't bring it up at all; the invasion of Panama ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฆ happened in December 1989 and ended in January 1990 under President George H.W. Bush (Bush Sr.) just in case you were wondering. Oh, and Kosovo ๐Ÿ‡ฝ๐Ÿ‡ฐ, can't forget about Kosovo ๐Ÿ‡ฝ๐Ÿ‡ฐ, these people love to bring that up from time-to-time, but not to same extent as any of those other ones I mentioned; partially because it wasn't as recent as any of those other conflicts I mentioned. So, Iraq ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ถ is usually the go-to.

But, all they do is perpetuate myths and conspiracy theories about the Iraq War ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ถ that just aren't true, that are objectively false if you were to look at the Iraq War ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ถ in a non-biased and good faith way. And they're just doing this to excuse or obfuscate China ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ's actions, China ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ's crimes and imperialistic ambitions, and believe me, China ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ does have imperialist ambitions; I mean, just look at their Belt & Road Initiative. And since this was during the backdrop of the pandemic ๐Ÿ˜ท, they really hated when the West was criticizing China ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ's response to the virus ๐Ÿฆ , and when the West was suggesting that the virus ๐Ÿฆ  escaped from a lab in Wuhan, the place where the pandemic ๐Ÿ˜ท started (a theory that has not been proven and many scientists around the world are skeptical of); so they were really trying extra hard to defend China ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ, and dismiss any and all criticisms towards the regime, constructive or not.

Obviously none of what Dumbrill said was actually true. The US ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ was not claiming that China ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ was holding WMD stockpiles in Shenzhen or Shanghai or wherever, and they were not trying to use it to justify an invasion of China ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ similar to the invasion of Iraq ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ถ. The US ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ doesn't want to invade China ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ, that's the very last thing they want to do; just the mere thought of a such thing fills American policymakers ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ with dread.

If anything, they've been trying everything they can to avoid a war with China ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ. Even going as far as saying that they want China ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ to succeed, but only by the rules. As in, within the bounds of international law, which China ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ continues to violate in regards to their South China Sea claims as well as their genocide against the Uyghur people in Xinjiang. But anyway, back to Chinese propaganda ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ about the war in Ukraine ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ.

The Chinese public ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ (for the most part) has fully bought into Russia ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ's narrative about the war in Ukraine ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ, and is fully convinced that they are fully justified in what they are doing, or at the very least, they are indifferent to it, and don't think it's a big deal, and that it doesn't affect them at all; those Chinese people ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ are wrong, it does affect them, mostly in regards to whether the Chinese government ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ, and Xi in particular, calculates from watching it unfold whether a full-scale invasion of Taiwan ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ผ is actually worth it or not; something that would affect the lives of every Chinese citizen ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ if it ever came to pass.

All of this is thanks to the efforts of Chinese propaganda channels ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ for the domestic audience, from how Chinese media ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ frames the war in Ukraine ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ for the Chinese public ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ. And it even isn't just the Chinese people ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ or even Westerners (Americans ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ, British ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง, Canadians ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ, French ๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท, Germans ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช, etc.), it's people in other countries that are more sympathetic to Russia ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ or are lukewarm about Russia ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ (meaning that aren't directly allied to Russia ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ, or friendly with Russia ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ, but are tolerant of them and just see them as a regular country) like India ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ, Hungary ๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡บ, Turkey ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ท, various African countries, various Latin American countries, the Solomon Islands ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ง (a country that's aligned with China ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ), the Maldives ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ป (a country is also aligned with China ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ, but is having a referendum on the country's current pro-Chinese leadership ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ  which may lead to the country decoupling from China ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ and moving closer to the West if the opposition wins), Mongolia ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ณ, and even Mexico ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฝ.

I read a comment on YouTube from a Mexican ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฝ saying that their government and their media has repeatedly towed the Russian line ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ, and has pushed Russian propaganda ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ about the war in Ukraine ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ; even if the person in question commenting didn't agree with it personally. This likely due to Mexico ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฝ's more positive stance on both China ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ and Russia ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ, the Mexican elite ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฝ were likely influenced by both countries and their propaganda about the war; that, and their less favorable view of the United States ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ, Mexico ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฝ's neighbor to the north.

All this, while China ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ still refuses to give Russia ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ direct military aid, despite Putin pleading to them to give them more weapons and ammunition. Like, the Chinese ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ are willing to help Russia ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ out in the propaganda war, voicing support for and justifying Russia ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ's actions, amplifying all of their talking points, and blaming everything on the West.

But, they aren't willing to actually help them out in the actual shooting war on the ground; probably because they know doing so would not actually be in their strategic best interests, since they would be sanctioned too, and they don't need that right now; their economy is already struggling without Western sanctions; and plus, Russia ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ's losing, and has shown incredible weakness, and a hilarious inability to overpower and overtake Ukraine ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ on the battlefield, so why help them militarily at all if they're already a lost cause at this point?

In fact, China ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ has refused to sell weapons and ammunition to Russia ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ so much, that Russia ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ literally had to turn to North Korea ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ต to get weapons and ammunition. Russian defense minister ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ, Sergei Shoigu traveled to Pyongyang in July, and Kim Jong-un met Vladimir Putin in Russia ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ (probably Vladivostok since it's the closest Russian city ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ to North Korea ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ต, or perhaps all the way to Moscow; he is going by train, he could take the Trans-Siberian Railroad) recently, in early September; it was all over the news.

A lot of western analysts believe the meeting between Kim and Putin is to strike a weapons deal where North Korea ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ต will provide ammunition and perhaps even weapons to the ammunition and weapons strapped Russia ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ for their war in Ukraine ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ in exchange for nuclear weapons technology ☢️ to boost North Korea ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ต's nuclear program ☢️, and even help with their satellite technology to launch a military or spy satellite into orbit. Russia ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ likely made a similar deal with Iran ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ท to get those Shahed 131 drones. And it's been reported that Shoigu even suggested that Russia ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ and North Korea ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ต may start conducting joint military exercises together, something they haven't been done in decades, likely since the Soviet Union ☭ was a thing.

Now, China ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ's position on Russia ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ and the war in Ukraine ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ may seem pretty confusing. Like, why would China ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ not provide any military aid to Russia ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ when they said their "friendship" had "no limits" just a few weeks before the invasion started, and when China ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ clearly has more modern and sophisticated military weaponry than the two countries that Russia ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ is currently getting weapons and ammunition from: Iran ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ท and North Korea ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ต? Well, think of it like this: China ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ wants to support Russia ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ and what it's doing in Ukraine ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ while taking as little risk as possible.

The communist regime ☭ in China ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ is quite risk averse (at least compared to the Putin regime in Russia ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ), and they don't want to do anything that will hurt their economy in any way, because they know that their economy is the source of their global political power. Their economy is literally the only reason why people say that they're a superpower or a potential superpower. And the Chinese ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ know that if they support the Russians ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ too openly and too directly, than they will be targeted by the West, and have severe sanctions placed on them, something that would only hurt their stagnating and even declining economy even more.

China ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ wants Russia ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ to win the war (clearly), but not if it'll cost them their own economic strength and global influence. So, that's why they've refused to give Russia ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ military aid, and only voiced propaganda support for Russia ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ's aggression in Ukraine ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ. They've pretty much decided to leave the direct military aid to Iran ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ท and North Korea ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ต because those two countries are already pariahs on the global stage. That way, they can be the patsies and take the fall if the war ends in a Russian defeat ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ ๐Ÿ˜ž, and the whole thing blows up in their faces. China ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ will be hurt in the long term after a Russian defeat ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ in the Ukraine war ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ, but not in the short term, and China ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ is only really thinking about the short term here.



Update (Friday October 20, 2023):

๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ณ

Remember how I said that Mongolia ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ณ is one of the countries that's lukewarm about Russia ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ? Well, as it turns out, that's a little complicated. You see, despite Mongolia ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ณ maintaining good relations with Russia ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ, the president, Ukhnaagiin Khรผrelsรผkh put out a video during the onset on the Russian invasion of Ukraine ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ, warning the ethnic minorities in Siberia that the Russian military ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ was conscripting them and using them as canon fodder in the war in Ukraine ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ; which is definitely true, the Russian military ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ is using ethnic minorities in the country as canon fodder in the war against Ukraine ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ. He also told them that they are more than welcome to come to Mongolia ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ณ seek asylum, and avoid conscription. On top of that, he was wearing a Ukrainian pin ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ or Ukrainian bow ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ when he was issuing this warning, clearly showing solidarity with Ukraine ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ.

 

 
(This is the flag of the Republic of Buryatia, a Russian republic ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ located in the Russian Far-East ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ, and mostly populated by ethnic Mongolic Buryat people. It's also the home of Lake Baikal, the largest freshwater lake ๐Ÿ’ฆ in the entire world.)
 

 

My guess is that Khรผrelsรผkh was mostly directing his message towards the ethnic Mongolic Buryat people who mainly live in the Russian republic ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ, Buryatia. Makes sense right? He's welcoming ethnic Mongols to come live in Mongolia ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ณ, and these ethnic Mongols are facing the brunt of Russian conscription ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ during the war in Ukraine ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ.

But, I do think he did mean other non-Mongolic Siberian peoples as well, other ethnic minorities in Siberia who live in poverty, and are being conscripted into Putin's war of aggression, like Tuvans for instance; Tuvans are an ethnic group who share a lot of cultural similarities with Mongols (they have throat singing just like Mongols do), but are a Turkic people who speak a Turkic language, which the Mongols aren't; the Mongols are a distinct ethnic group from the Turks, and speak a distinct language. And let's not forget, Buryats are not the only Mongolic ethnic group in Russia ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ, there's also the Kalmyks, who mainly live in the Republic of Kalmykia, although that republic is in Southern Russia ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ, as oppose to Buryatia, which is in Siberia (the Russian Far-East ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ). 

 

(This is the flag of the Republic of Kalmykia, a Russian republic ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ located in Southern Russia ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ. It is mostly populated by the ethnic Mongolic Kalmyk people, and is one of the few Buddhist majority regions ☸️ of Russia ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ.)
 



So, I think Khรผrelsรผkh is welcome any and all ethnic minority groups in Russia ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ that want to escape conscriptions, and even ethnic Russians as well. Mongolia ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ณ has become a popular destination for ethnic Russians who want to flee the country to escape conscription or mobilization, or just to escape the increasingly totalitarian rule of Vladimir Putin. It's easy for them because Russian is a commonly spoken language in Mongolia ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ณ. 

 

(This is the flag of the Bogd Khanate of Mongolia, the first independent government of Mongolia after the fall of the Qing Dynasty. It was disbanded after the Chinese retook control of Mongolia in 1919.)
 



I mean, Mongolia ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ณ has historically been in Russia ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ's sphere of influence, ever since it first gained independence from China, after the dissolution of the Qing Dynasty, and the end of imperial rule in China overall in 1912; it lost its independence to the Republic of China (ROC) ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ผ for a brief time, but regained it in 1921. Mongolia ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ณ became a communist state ☭ (called the Mongolian People's Republic) in 1924, and was firmly a Soviet client state ☭ up until 1992 after the Soviet Union ☭ collapsed.

 

(This is the flag of the Mongolian People's Republic, the communist Mongolian government ☭๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ณ that was set in 1924 after Mongolia gained independence from China, and lasted until 1992, 1 year after the fall of the Soviet Union ☭. The Mongolian People's Republic had many different flags, but this particular one was adopted in 1945 and was used until the communist regime ☭'s dissolution in 1992, when the country adopted the flag it uses now ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ณ.)
 



The communist regime ☭ in Mongolia ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ณ was disbanded and replaced with the government Mongolia ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ณ still has today thanks to a new constitution being adopted, and the communist party ☭, the Mongolian People's Revolutionary Party ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ณ essentially being forced to step down to allow multi-party elections to take place; Mongolia ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ณ had become a democracy. Despite this, that party is still around, it's still part of mainstream Mongolian politics ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ณ, but it changed its name to the Mongolian People's Party ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ณ, and it abandoned Marxist-Leninism in favor of democratic socialism.

Yes, right wingers, they are completely different ideologies, and they do not correlate with one another, nor does one necessarily lead to the other; democratic socialism or social democracy does not automatically lead to Marxist-Leninism. Most Marxist-Leninist states throughout history have established through violent or forceful methods, whether through violent revolution, through civil war, or through coup d'รฉtat, or were installed by a foreign invading power (*cough* the Soviet Union ☭ *cough* *cough* Vietnam ๐Ÿ‡ป๐Ÿ‡ณ *cough*); there hasn't been a Marxist-Leninist state that I can think of that started out as a democratic socialist state and then became Marxist-Leninist. A couple or a few Marxist-Leninist states may have come to power through a democratic process, but they're Marxist-Leninist from the get-go; it's not that they're democratic socialist and then become Marxist-Leninist, they are always Marxist-Leninist from the beginning. Anyway, back to the Mongolian People's Party ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ณ.

The current Mongolian president ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ณ, Khรผrelsรผkh, the guy I've been talking about throughout this update, is in fact a member of the Mongolian People's Party ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ณ. He was their candidate for the 2021 presidential election, which he won handsomely as you can see; to this day, it remains the oldest political party in Mongolia ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ณ. So, yeah, long story short, of course Russian was going to be a common language in the country, even to this day. Even the Mongolian language itself uses the Cyrillic alphabet in most official script just like Russian does, although the Mongolians ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ณ do still maintain the old traditional Mongolian alphabet/script (the one that's written vertically top down), but most official Mongolian documents ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ณ today are written in the Cyrillic alphabet.

It's pretty surprising to see the President of Mongolia ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ณ take such an overtly pro-Ukrainian stance ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ, and actually warn non-Russian ethnic groups living in Russia ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ (in Siberia) about being conscripted in the war, and telling them that they can come to Mongolia ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ณ for refuge if they wish, despite his government's official pro-Russian stance ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ. I mean, I still Mongolian officials ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ณ are still meeting with Russian officials ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ in Ulaanbaatar (Mongolia ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ณ's capital) and probably in Moscow (Russia ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ's capital) too.

How is that? How is it that the Mongolian president ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ณ can film a video warning Siberians that the Russian military ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ is conscripting them to fight in Ukraine ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ and using them as canon fodder, and telling them they can escape to Mongolia ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ณ, and yet still maintain a healthy and friendly relation with Putin's Russia ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ? Why would he want to do that? Why would the Mongolian government ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ณ want to do that?

Well, my guess is that the Mongolians ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ณ want to maintain good relations with the Russians ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ because they don't want to face the wrath of Russia ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ's military might themselves; they don't want to be attacked by Russia ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ at a time when Russia ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ has already invaded one of its neighbors. Mongolia ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ณ directly borders Russia ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ, it shares a massive land border with Russia ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ, and Mongolia ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ณ's military isn't anywhere near as large or powerful as Russia ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ's. So, in the event of a war, Mongolia ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ณ would likely have a tough time defending itself against Russia ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ, unless it had outside help; if other countries were supplying military aid like the Ukrainians ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ are receiving.

It's a complete reversal of the military dynamic centuries ago, when it was the Mongols who were more powerful militarily, and it was the Russians who were militarily weaker and feared the military might of the Mongols; the Russians and other peoples of the Kyivan Rus' that faced the brunt of the Mongol Empire's expansion into Europe; they even learned a thing or two from the Mongols, things that they would use in their own imperialist expansion into Siberia.

So, from Ulaanbaatar's perspective, it's better to stay on Moscow's good side for now, than to be openly hostile towards them, even if they disagree with their decision to invade Ukraine ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ, and disagree with their decision to mainly conscript ethnic minorities in the country like the Mongolic Buryat people rather than ethnic Russians who mostly live west of the Ural Mountains in European Russia ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ; ethnic Russians who live in cities like Moscow or Saint Petersburg aren't facing the brunt of the war, and don't have to face the reality of the war.

Besides, Russia ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ is losing the war against Ukraine ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ, the Ukrainians ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ are kicking the Russians' asses ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ, and the Russians' military capabilities ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ are being degraded. So, the Mongolians ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ณ don't even have to be all that openly hostile towards the Russians ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ or be all that openly friendly towards the Ukrainians ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ. They can just keep things business as usual, and wait for the Russian military ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ to be weakened the point that it's no longer a threat to them.

So, we can see why the Mongolians ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ณ may be maintaining good relations with the Russians ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ despite them disagreeing with them on Ukraine ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ. But, why are the Russians ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ okay with this? Why are they okay with the Mongolians ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ณ taking a more pro-Ukraine stance ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ, and telling their citizens that's okay for them to flee conscription and mobilization into Mongolia ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ณ? You'd think the Russians ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ would be more upset by that, and demanding the Mongolians ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ณ walk back their statements, or threatening to sever ties with them or whatever. But, no, that's not happening. Why is that? Why are the Russians ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ just accepting this?

Well, my only guess is that Russia ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ still wants to maintain its influence over Mongolia ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ณ. Mongolia ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ณ has been in the Russian orbit ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ since the early 20th century, Russian is a dominant language in Mongolia ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ณ even to this day. And the Russians ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ don't want to give that up, they don't want to lose Mongolia ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ณ to China ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ. The same competition or dilemma is playing out in Central Asia as well, with all the post-Soviet countries in that region, Kazakhstan ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ฟ, Uzbekistan ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฟ, Turkmenistan ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ฒ, Tajikistan ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ฏ, and Kyrgyzstan ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ฌ; those countries were all apart of the Soviet Union ☭, they were all constituent Soviet republics ☭, whereas Mongolia ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ณ was simply a Soviet client state ☭, within the Eastern Bloc. This is all the result of Russia ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ not realizing that it's a declining power, and that it's the junior partner to China ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ in this new "axis" against the West.

Speaking of China ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ, Mongolia ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ณ has sort of made the same calculation about China ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ that they have Russia ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ, though it is a bit different. For one thing, Mongolia ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ณ used to be apart of China, during the imperial era (China was even ruled by a Mongol dynasty at one point), for a brief time under the ROC ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ผ. But, after the Chinese ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ผ lost control of Mongolia ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ณ again, this time to a Soviet-backed communist revolution ☭, and they were kind of forced to relinquish control of it for good. The Soviets ☭ forced them to recognize Mongolia ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ณ's independence after World War II, and the Chinese ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ผ begrudgingly agreed because they didn't want to deal with the Soviet military ☭, especially when they had their own internal problems to deal with like the communist insurgency ☭ led by Mao Zedong.

Even after the communists ☭ took control and established the People's Republic of China ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ (PRC), they made no attempts at retaking Mongolia ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ณ because they were still friendly with the Soviets ☭, and respected their wishes to have an independent Mongolia ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ณ, and even when they weren't, they still saw Mongolia ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ณ as a convenient buffer zone separating them from the Soviets ☭. That BTW was also one of the big reasons why the Soviets ☭ didn't annex Mongolia ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ณ themselves, despite the Mongolian communists ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ณ☭ asking them to, because Mongolia ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ณ was a convenient buffer separating them from China ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ.

Though I should note that the Soviets ☭ had a nuclear deterrent ☢️, so Mongolia ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ณ's role as a land buffer was rendered obsolete by the time the Soviets ☭ developed their own nuclear weapons ☢️ after World War II. China ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ did not have nuclear weapons ☢️ until the 1960s, so Mongolia ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ณ was still somewhat useful to them as a land buffer up until the 60s, when the Sino-Soviet Split ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ☭ had happened and the Chinese ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ at long last had their own nukes ☢️.  

Plus, an independent Mongolia ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ณ served the Soviets' ☭ interests just fine, annexing it was just unnecessary in their eyes. I'm kind of surprised that the Chinese ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ or the Soviets didn't decide to also give Mongolia ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ณ nukes ☢️, or use it as a platform to deploy their own nukes ☢️ to really enhance deterrence, and increase Mongolia ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ณ's role as buffer. But, I suppose a nuclear-armed Mongolia ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ณ☢️ really didn't serve either the Chinese ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ or the Soviets' ☭ best interest, if it would've helped maintain Mongolia ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ณ's role as a buffer state between the two communist juggernauts, especially during the Sino-Soviet Split ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ☭.

 

 

(This is the flag of the Soviet Union ☭, or the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics ☭, or USSR ☭ short.)

 



And in modern times, in the post-Cold War world, Mongolia ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ณ has still maintained pretty strong bilateral ties with China ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ. They've participated in the Belt & Road Initiative (BRI), and the Chinese ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ have developed infrastructure projects in the country. But, despite this, the Mongolians ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ณ don't fully trust the Chinese ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ or agree with everything they do or say, and recently, they've been trying to establish a closer and friendlier relationship with the United States ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ.

But, similar to the Russians ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ, the Mongolians ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ณ know they can't anger or alienate the Chinese ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ too much, otherwise they might risk military retaliation against them, and the Mongolian military ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ณ is definitely outmatched by the Chinese military ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ in terms of size and power. And they also know that the Chinese ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ could reassert their claim over their territory, and may take steps to reincorporate Mongolia ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ณ into their territory again. Ever since Xi Jinping took power, he's been reasserting China ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ's claim over certain territories based on historical precedent. And he's using his military, the People's Liberation Army (PLA), to intimidate his neighbors to try to reestablish control of those territories, and Mongolia ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ณ could always be next. After all, Mongolia ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ณ did used to belong to China, not to the PRC ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ, but to past imperial dynasties; and the ROC ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ผ, but the PRC ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ would rather you forget about that detail.

So, the Mongolians ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ณ definitely want to stay on Xi's China ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ's good side just they stay on Putin's Russia ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ's good side, and that's why they haven't been as forthright with the relationship with the Americans ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ as they might've been otherwise. That's why Ulaanbaatar has been trying to stay on the good sides of both Moscow and Beijing, it's in their best interest to do so. When you're a landlocked country sandwiched in-between two major world powers who have imperialistic ambitions and could turn hostile at any time as Mongolia ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ณ is, and your military forces aren't strong enough to resist either of them or both of them on their own without outside assistance that isn't guaranteed, you can't afford to be too assertive and make them angry at you.

At the same time though, don't be surprised if there's a scenario in which China ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ invades Taiwan ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ผ, and starts forcefully conscripting Mongolians in Inner Mongolia to fight against Taiwan ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ผ (and the US ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ and Japan ๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ต), and the Mongolian president ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ณ (whoever that may be) puts out a video telling Mongolians from Inner Mongolia to come to Mongolia ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ณ to avoid conscription into the Chinese military ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ.

But anyway, I just thought that I would write this update telling you that Mongolia ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ณ's relationship with Russia ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ (or China ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ for that matter) isn't that cut and dry, that there are things that the Mongolians ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ณ disagree with the Russians ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ on; the Ukraine war ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ being one of them. The video with the Mongolian president ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ณ was brought my attention by another video by a YouTube channel called the Icarus Project, I'll link it down below. The Icarus Project is a pro-Ukrainian channel ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ that focuses a lot on making videos about Russia ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ, explaining why Russia ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ is the way it is, and the challenges that Russia ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ faces ever since it decided to invade Ukraine ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ.

It's a pretty new YouTube channel, it barely started last year on September 20, 2022, and only has 24 videos, and the guy behind it admittedly talks in a very dry and monotone voice; which makes some of his sarcastic quips and jokes fall flat. I'm entirely sure if this channel is even really run by a real person or if it's an AI, or if it is a real person, but they use a fake computerized voice.

If it is indeed run by a real person using their real voice, they definitely edited out all the breaths in-between each sentence, which indicates a real person talking. Which is understandable. I do that too, or I used to when I still did YouTube videos because those breaths in-between sentences can be a bit distracting, but only if you really looking out of them; most people probably don't even notice or perceive those breaths.

But, anyway, concerns about the channel and the person who runs it aside, this video that I'm talking about talks about Siberia, and the people who live in, and the hardship that they've faced and continue to face at the hands of the Russians ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ. It is certainly eye opening, especially those unfamiliar with Russian history ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ or contemporary Russian politics ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ.

It definitely shows that Russia ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ really was no different from the other colonialist imperialist powers of centuries past, and was arguably worse or just as bad, especially during the Soviet period ☭, when the Soviet government ☭ took more heavy handed steps to suppress indigenous Siberian cultures and languages, and Russify these regions, and force the Soviet way ☭ of doing onto these Siberian peoples.

It definitely pokes in a hole in the narrative that Russia ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ is somehow an anti-imperialist power, trying to resist the clutches of colonialism. Of course, this isn't to excuse America ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ and other Western or Western-aligned powers of the things they've done and continue to do in some cases, but it is to show the Russia ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ and China ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ don't have legs to stand on as far as being "anti-colonialist" or "anti-imperialist."

They're imperialist, colonialist powers just like the rest of them, and they're even embarking on a neocolonialist project now in the 21st century, especially in places like Africa, Central Asia, the South China Sea, and of course, Siberia to name a few. On top of that, Russia ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ and China ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ refuse to even acknowledge their past colonialist misdeeds, let alone their current colonialist and imperialist transgressions.

At least the US ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ, Canada ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ, Australia ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ, and New Zealand ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฟ are trying to make up for their misdeeds, and make things right with their indigenous populations, by acknowledging that they did wrongdoings and are trying to reconcile and build a better path for the future by granting indigenous people more rights, granting them more autonomy and self-determination, returning stolen lands, and recognizing their languages, and so on. It isn't perfect, there's still a long way to go, and there have certainly been setbacks; and some pretty severe setbacks at that in some cases. But, at least it's step in the right direction.

Russia ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ and China ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ aren't doing any of that. They refuse to even acknowledge that they've done anything wrong throughout their history, and still like to paint themselves as the good guys in every situation. And they're continuing to commit these same transgressions (or worse) against their ethnic minorities and indigenous groups even to this day, while trying to present themselves to the outside world as "anti-imperialist" or "anti-colonialist."

It's sort of like how the Empire of Japan ๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ต tried to present itself as an anti-colonialist pan-Asian power trying to liberate Asia from the grasp of European and American imperialism and colonialism, but were themselves imperialists and colonialists, and were arguably way worse than the Europeans or Americans ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ they were replacing.

At least, Japan ๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ต is on a better path now than it was during the days of the Empire, but they haven't fully acknowledged all of their wrongdoings during World War II or during their colonialist rule over places like Korea. And while they have made attempts to reconcile with the Ainu people in particular, those efforts have so far have left a lot to be desired; not the US ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ is one to talk. But, anyway, it's better if you just watch the video yourself rather than just read my long-winded ramblings, so here you go:

 

Link to the Icarus Project's video on Siberia:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=4gMrVgIf120



 

Update (Wednesday November 29, 2023):

๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ

In the main part of the article, I talked about how China ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ wants to help Russia ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ in the war in Ukraine ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ, while taking as little risk as possible, that they want them to win, but not if it'll cost them economically, and they ultimately just leave it to pariah states like North Korea ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ต and Iran ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ท to provide Russia ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ direct military assistance. Well, I'm sure anyone reading that could ask, "Well, isn't that sort of like what the United States ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ and the West as a whole is doing with Ukraine ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ?"

Yes, you could say that China ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ is essentially taking the same approach to Russia ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ that United States ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ is taking with Ukraine ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ. They're helping their preferred country to only to the extent that they won't negatively affected in any way. A lot of people have criticized the US ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ for only providing incremental support to Ukraine ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ, and not forming a coherent strategy around helping Ukraine ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ win the war.

Ben Hodges harps about this all the time, in pretty much every interview he does about the war in Ukraine ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ.  He says that thinks that the Biden administration should say that "We want Ukraine ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ to win," and forming a coherent strategy around helping Ukraine ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ win, and providing them capabilities they need to win. Mainly, he just wants the US ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ to provide Ukraine ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ all of the military capabilities it needs to retake Crimea, because for him, Crimea is the decisive terrain as he calls it.

Once Ukraine ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ retakes Crimea, then it'll essentially be all over for the Russians ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ. The Russian military ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ will lose one of its main apparatuses for power projection, and will greatly degraded. Putin's legitimacy back at home will greatly affected, and he will be forced to withdraw his forces, if his forces hadn't already retreated back into Russia ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ by that point, and Ukraine ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ will have all of its territory back.

It's not as straightforward as he puts it, like retaking Crimea won't immediately end the war. But it will be an important step towards a Ukrainian victory ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ, and it will put Ukraine ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ in a better position to regain all of its territory from Russia ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ. And losing Crimea will certainly hurt Putin and hurt the Russian military ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ, and will greatly limit their ability to project power in the wider world outside of Eastern Europe.

But, because the Biden administration hasn't done this, and hasn't declared that their goal is Ukrainian victory ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ, a lot of people have speculated that they don't actually want Ukraine ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ to win. They think that they just want Ukraine ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ to survive, but not win, and they want the Russians ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ to be weakened, but not collapse.

So, they've been trying to strike this balance of keeping the war going long enough to degrade Russia ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ's military capabilities, but not end too quickly to allow Ukraine ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ to decisively win and regain all of its territory, and possibly lead to Russian collapse ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ. They don't want another Libya ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡พ or Syria ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡พ situation. Russia ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ after all is a thousand times bigger than Libya ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡พ and Syria ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡พ combined, and it has the world's largest nuclear weapon stockpile ☢️. So, that's why they think they've only been providing military aid to Ukraine ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ incrementally, to keep Ukraine ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ alive, but not win, so that the war will ultimately end in a stalemate and a negotiated settlement so that things can go back to the way things were.

While I do think is some merit to that theory, I don't think it's the entire reason why the United States ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ hasn't provided everything Ukraine ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ would theoretically need to win the war, and regain all of its territory. This theory neglects to mention the fear of escalation. Ever since the year started in 2022, the Biden administration has been fearful of Russian escalation ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ. 

Like, if we provide Ukraine ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ a certain weapon system or if we let Ukraine ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ attack Russian territory ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ, then Russia ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ will escalate and might use nuclear weapons ☢️. Obviously, no body wants a nuclear war ☢️, except some crazy people, and no body in America ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ wants to get directly involved the war, and have to deploy our own forces against Russia ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ, not even people who support Ukraine ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ. After all, Iraq ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ถ and Afghanistan ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ซ were both disasters.

So, the Biden admin just decides to impose arbitrary restrictions on itself and on Ukraine ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ in how to prosecute the war. Telling them that they can't attack Russian territory ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ, and withholding certain weapon systems that they're afraid will upset Putin, and provoke him into going nuclear ☢️. You know, at least, until they finally muster up the courage to actually give Ukraine ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ the weapons they were afraid would upset the Russians ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ, and provoke them into escalating the war, and then Russia ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ doesn't do anything. How that hasn't convinced the US ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ or any other country that providing weapons to Ukraine ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ is fine, and that Russia ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ won't do anything no matter what they say, I don't know. But, that's how it's been playing out.

So, in a sense, you could say that China ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ is essentially approaching this war the same way the United States ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ is. I've even heard people say more broadly that China ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ and the United States ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ share a lot of similarities. And yeah, there some similarities. They're both superpowers, or wannabe superpowers in the case of China ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ. They're both risk averse, and want a world based on stability and predictability rather than a world based in chaos and unpredictability. One is clearly more risk averse than the other. And both try to morally grandstand, and act like they're morally superior to everyone else. China ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ likes to pretend that it's morally superior to the United States ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ certainly, even though by all measures, it isn't.

I've seen people try to compare the United States ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ to Russia ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ, especially in regards to the road to war, and how they got there, and how it compares to the war in Iraq ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ถ. That's basically the thesis of Sarcasmitron's entire series on the Russo-Ukrainian War ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ. He concluded that Putin's foreign policy, and Russia ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ's warlike mentality right now is almost identical to Bush's foreign policy, and the United States ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ's warlike mentality after 9/11. According to the thesis presented in his most recent video, America ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ was essentially playing by Russia ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ's playbook with the Chechen Wars, and Russia ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ was playing by America ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ's playbook with the Iraq War ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ถ and the War in Afghanistan ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ซ. These two countries were basically copying each other's homework so to speak, without either country realizing it or acknowledging it.

He even said that the war in Iraq ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ถ was fought with the same goal in mind as the war in Ukraine ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ: to end the international liberal order. And he also concluded that Putin's paranoia and his trajectory towards war with Georgia ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ช and Ukraine ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ can be traced back to a conspiracy theory dreamt up by a crazy American cult leader ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ.

He even said that Russia ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ's hybrid warfare tactics that they used on Ukraine ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ (specifically the war in Donbas) prior to the 2022 invasion, were born out of this conspiracy theory and Russia ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ trying to use it against the West. But, since they were based on a conspiracy theory that was pure fantasy, pure make believe, these hybrid warfare tactics didn't work as intended, and Russia ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ was forced to resort to conventional force invasions, one in 2014 (two if you count the annexation of Crimea at the start of the war) and one in 2022, which the one that's on-going right now. And yeah, there are a lot of similarities there too, in fact, there are arguably more similarities between America ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ and Russia ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ than there are between America ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ and China ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ, especially in regards to their histories, their racism, and their horrific colonial pasts.

With that being said however, that would all be ignoring the huge differences. For one thing, the US ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ is providing direct military aid to one side in the war, and is open and honest about it, China ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ isn't. China ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ isn't providing aid to either side in the war, and even if they are, they're being pretty secretive about it. There are some rumors that China ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ is providing military aid to Russia ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ through third parties and through back channels, and I think the French secret service ๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท, the DGSE said something to that effect, but there is no concrete evidence that China ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ is providing military aid to Russia ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ at this time.

So, for the sake of brevity, let's just say that China ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ isn't providing Russia ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ any military aid, and is just letting North Korea ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ต and Iran ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ท do all that. Another big difference between the way China ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ is handling the war in Ukraine ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ and the way the US ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ is handling the war in Ukraine ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ is that China ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ's hesitation to go all in is based on economic and reputational concerns, whereas the US ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ's is based on concerns about escalation and regional stability.

The Chinese ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ don't want the war to damage their economy any more than it already is, they don't want the war to turn Europe ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡บ against them, and they want Putin to stay in power. The Americans ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ on the other hand, don't want the war to escalate beyond the borders of Ukraine ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ, and turn into a wider European war, or turn into a nuclear war ☢️, and they also don't want Russia ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ to collapse, and break apart or descend into civil war.

It's sort of similar to how Washington views the war in Gaza between Israel ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ and Hamas, and how they're approaching it. They don't want the war to escalate and turn into a wider regional war, and destabilize the Middle East. Some of these worries and concerns might overlap, but they're based on completely different calculuses. And we should recognize that in how we think about this war, and the different players that are involved.



Link to Sarcasmitron's video about the American origins of Putin's madness ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7OFyn_KSy80


 



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

My Thoughts on “The Fifth Element”

My Thoughts on "Ruby Gloom"

My Thoughts on "Star Wars: Episode II – Attack of the Clones"