The Assad Regime Has Fallen ๐ธ๐พ
(This is the current flag of Syria ๐ธ๐พ as of the time of this writing.)
Well guys, the day that no body thought would ever come has become: the Assad regime in Syria ๐ธ๐พ has fallen. The country is now under the control of the rebels. Now, I was originally going to talk about this in the foreword of a repost or first time post of an old thing that I haven't posted anywhere before. I was also going to do the same about the recent martial law order imposed in South Korea ๐ฐ๐ท by its current president, Yoon Suk Yeol which ended after a few hours due to the huge opposition from the Democratic Party (the current opposition party) and the South Korean people ๐ฐ๐ท themselves. But, I had so much to say about this, especially in light of the recent developments, that I decided that I couldn't wait any longer, and just decided to make this its own post. I'll probably end up doing the same for the martial law order in South Korea ๐ฐ๐ท especially if I can't get Weekend in Taipei working on my PS4. Damn internet connection ๐ ๐ .
Now, when I was originally thinking about talking about this in a foreword of another post, the rebel group known as Hayat Tahrir al-Sham had taken the city of Aleppo, which is the second largest city in Syria ๐ธ๐พ and was relentlessly bombed by Russia ๐ท๐บ during the civil war. Everyone was caught off guard by this, including Bashar al-Assad and his forces, because no body saw it coming. It came out of no where and took everyone by surprise because Aleppo was firmly under the control of the Assad regime, they gained control of the city, largely thanks to the help of the Russian military ๐ท๐บ, and they thought they had a tight grip on the city. Everyone thought they had it locked down.
But, Tahrir al-Sham completely shattered that illusion by taking the city within just three days. The Syrian military ๐ธ๐พ barely put up a fight, and the government forces as a whole there completely collapsed. Though, it should be noted that while the Western media started paying attention to this once Aleppo was captured, the rebel offensive did not start in Aleppo. The rebels had already taken several towns and villages before they marched into Aleppo as the government forces continued to put up token resistance before completely disintegrating. But, Aleppo really was when Assad and the whole world started to pay attention and take this latest rebel offensive seriously.
But, despite losing Aleppo, a lot of western analysts believed that the Assad regime would not fall, and that Assad would hold firm, maintaining his grip on power, even as Idlib, Hama, and Homs were taken. The one who I saw state this the strongest was Ian Bremmer, an American political scientist, entrepreneur, and author ๐บ๐ธ who often focuses on geopolitics and foreign policy. He said that despite what happened in Aleppo, Assad would not fall and that Russia ๐ท๐บ and Iran ๐ฎ๐ท would likely come to his aid. Or something to that effect. I don't remember exactly what he said, it's been a day or two since I've seen his video.
But, then earlier today, the rebels took Damascus, meeting little-to-no resistance from government forces, and the Assad regime fell. So, I guess Ian has a bit of egg on his face for that prediction. Wouldn't be the first time he was wrong about something. To be fair to Ian though, the Russians ๐ท๐บ and the Iranians ๐ฎ๐ท did sort of intervene in the war, but their response to the rebels was token at best. They just did a few airstrikes in Aleppo, and then just called it a day. The IRGC did jack all to resist the rebels, I don't even know what they did which just goes to show how little they actually and how weak their response was. And as we saw, those Russian airstrikes ๐ท๐บ and whatever the hell the Iranians ๐ฎ๐ท did made absolutely no difference whatsoever, and the rebels just marched to Damascus, captured the city, and sent Assad packing.
So now, the Assad regime is no more, Assad himself has fled the country, likely into Russia ๐ท๐บ just other disgraced pro-Russian leader ๐ท๐บ Viktor Yanukovych, and Syria ๐ธ๐พ is now control of the rebels, more specifically, Tahrir al-Sham. Bringing the Syrian Civil War ๐ธ๐พ, at least as we knew it, to an end. It ended rather anticlimactically I must say. Just like how President Yoon's attempt to declare martial law and become dictator ended in a wet fart, this war has gone on for 13 years ended so abruptly and with very little fanfare. There are actually people out there who have been speculating that Assad chose to flee to Moscow and not Tehran is because he's hoping that the Russians ๐ท๐บ will help reinstall him back into power, but I don't think that's going to happen. I mean, the US ๐บ๐ธ didn't help Chiang Kai-shek retake the mainland after he lost the Chinese Civil War ๐จ๐ณ๐น๐ผ and fled to Taiwan. What would make Assad think Russia ๐ท๐บ will help him retake Syria ๐ธ๐พ? He's delusional if he actually thinks Vladimir Putin will do that for him. He's still got a war in Ukraine ๐บ๐ฆ that he's still trying to win. He has no time to help a disgraced Middle Eastern dictator retake power.
As stated before, the Syrian military ๐ธ๐พ barely put up any sort of resistance to the rebels. From what I've read, it seems like in a lot of cases, they just dropped their weapons, dropped their uniforms and fled as soon as the rebels showed up. That's what happened in Damascus, the Syrian Army ๐ธ๐พ put up no resistance and largely just abandoned their posts and just ran, allowing the rebels to take the city with relative ease. And even though some news outlets have covered on this, it isn't making the waves that you'd think that it would considering how earth shattering this is, considering how big of a shift this is. This is as big as when the US ๐บ๐ธ and NATO withdrew from Afghanistan ๐ฆ๐ซ in 2021. This was a civil war that had been going on for 13 years since 2011. It had been going on in the background of our lives for the entirety of the 2010s and the early part of the 2020s. Of course for Syrians ๐ธ๐พ and anyone else living in the Middle East, it was at the forefront of their lives, they were being directly affected by it. And now, with the toppling of Assad, it seems that it's over.
The Syrian Civil War ๐ธ๐พ was a brutal conflict. It created a humanitarian crisis that has only been rivaled by other such conflicts as the Yemeni Civil War ๐พ๐ช, the war in Gaza between Israel ๐ฎ๐ฑ and Hamas, and the current civil war in Sudan ๐ธ๐ฉ which I like to call the Third Sudanese Civil War ๐ธ๐ฉ since it is the third civil war in Sudan ๐ธ๐ฉ's entire history, can you believe that ๐จ? The Syrian Civil War ๐ธ๐พ claimed the lives of around 580,000 to 617,910 people ๐ which is about half a million people, making it one of the deadliest conflicts of the 21st century so far ๐.
It also displaced close to 6.7 million people internally and about 6.6 million externally, causing a refugee crisis in Europe that ultimately led to Brexit ๐ฌ๐ง and the rise of right-wing populism as a whole across the continent. It also empowered and emboldened Russia ๐ท๐บ to continue its military adventures abroad, and may have even partially led to the full-scale invasion of Ukraine ๐บ๐ฆ in 2022, escalating the war in Ukraine ๐บ๐ฆ to a level it hadn't been before and extending the war for another three years and still ongoing. And for what? So that this bozo can stay in power? That really blew up in his face now did it?
Honestly, this couldn't have happened to a better guy ♂︎ than Assad. The guy ♂︎'s a piece of shit, he was a dictator, and he killed thousands of people of his own. He dropped bombs on them including barrel bombs (bombs made with barrels filled with nails, shrapnel, and explosives dropped by hand from helicopters ๐), he gunned them down, fired tank rounds at them, and he used chemical weapons ☣️ on them multiple times. He sent thousands of people, people he considered enemies to his regime, to torture prisons such as the Saydnaya prison which was sort of equivalent to the Abu Ghraib prison in Saddam's Iraq ๐ฎ๐ถ or the Evin Prison in Iran ๐ฎ๐ท. The prisoners sent to Saydnaya have only just been freed now that Assad has fallen and the rebels have taken control. And the stories these former political prisoners have to tell about their experiences in Saydnaya are horrific ๐ฐ.
He was not a good guy ♂︎, and he pretty much deserved everything that has happened to him in the last couple of weeks, in the last 24 hours. He deserved to lose power. And yet, there are still people in the West (too many of whom are on the Left) who still defend this guy ♂︎ and say that he didn't do anything wrong and it was all just an American psy-op ๐บ๐ธ, and will no doubt cry crocodile tears ๐ญ now that he's gone and they've lost. The fact that he ran, and fled to Russia ๐ท๐บ as soon as the rebels took Damascus tells everything you need to know about him and his character. He didn't care about the Syrian people ๐ธ๐พ, he just cared about himself and his own power. And he thought he had it.
I think Assad began to believe in his own myth, he believed that he was invincible, that he was untouchable, and he was going to rule Syria ๐ธ๐พ for the rest of his life until he was a frail old man ♂︎ just like his daddy, Hafez. And if things really did get bad for him, Russia ๐ท๐บ and Iran ๐ฎ๐ท would protect him. He thought that they could come in and save him just like they did in 2015. But, because Russia ๐ท๐บ is completely distracted by the war in Ukraine ๐บ๐ฆ, Iran ๐ฎ๐ท is distracted by what's going on in Gaza and Lebanon ๐ฑ๐ง, and Hezbollah has been severely weakened by Israel ๐ฎ๐ฑ's ongoing war in Lebanon ๐ฑ๐ง, they didn't. Assad was all on his own, and as many experts suspected, once he was on his own, he wouldn't be able to protect himself and his regime and he would quickly fall. Of course, we can't forget Russia ๐ท๐บ's complicity in all this.
They helped Assad throughout this war, they directly intervened militarily to save him when it looked as if his regime was going to fall, they defended him diplomatically when he was doing things that were indefensible (using chemical weapons ☣️ on his people), and they took part in some of his crimes. They helped Assad retake Aleppo by bombing it into smithereens, just pancaking city blocks with precision guided missiles and bombs just like Israel ๐ฎ๐ฑ has been doing to the cities in the Gaza Strip and in cities in Lebanon ๐ฑ๐ง, just like the Russians ๐ท๐บ themselves did to Grozny in Chechnya in the 90s and 2000s, and just like the Russians ๐ท๐บ have been doing to cities in Ukraine ๐บ๐ฆ for the past three years. It was because of Russia ๐ท๐บ that Assad was able to stay in power as long as he did. But he didn't control the whole country, there were still parts of the country that were out of his control like the northern half which was controlled by the Kurds, and then you had pockets of the country (big and small) which were controlled by various rebel factions including Tahrir al-Sham. So, he was essentially ruling over a divided country, the civil war had caused Syria ๐ธ๐พ to break apart, which meant that his total rule over the country was tenuous at best.
So, with Assad gone, Putin just lost a major ally in the Middle East, and it is further sign that his global influence is waning as a result of his decision to invade Ukraine ๐บ๐ฆ. A decision he had made himself with very input from anyone else, and has no one to blame for disastrous results of but himself. The Iranians ๐ฎ๐ท have also lost a bit of influence as a result of Assad being kicked out by the rebels. Assad was both the Russians ๐ท๐บ and the Iranians' ๐ฎ๐ท project, he was their joint venture, as we saw today, he failed. It's funny really in a morbid kind of way ๐, Assad started this war so that he could hold onto power, and yet it ultimately ended with him having none at all.
(These are the flags of Iran ๐ฎ๐ท and Hezbollah. The flag on the top is the Iranian flag ๐ฎ๐ท, and the flag on the bottom is the Hezbollah flag.)
In the end, he made the same mistake Muammar Gaddafi did, by fighting back, by resisting his own people and their calls for change. It just took longer for him than it did Gaddafi for the chickens ๐ to come home to roost. Had he just stepped down during the height of the Arab Spring instead of killing protesters ๐ชง, thousands of people wouldn't be dead, millions of people wouldn't have been displaced, and there wouldn't have been a refugee crisis that fueled the rise of right-wing populism in Europe, and the UK ๐ฌ๐ง wouldn't have left the EU ๐ช๐บ, and Assad himself would've been a better position politically. He could've stayed in Syria ๐ธ๐พ, living out the rest of his days in cushy retirement, instead of fleeing to Russia ๐ท๐บ.
I guess that is one way he got off easier than Gaddafi, he's still alive and didn't get brutally killed. He even got off easier than Saddam Hussein since he was put on trial, wasn't found guilty, wasn't sentenced to death, and then hung. But all honesty, he belongs in prison for the rest of his life for all the war crimes and crimes against humanity he committed during the war. Crimes that many on the Right and the Left in the West still deny to this day. So, while he did get his comeuppance a little bit by losing his power, he won't to be held accountable for his horrible crimes, and will ultimately escape justice. That is one of the sad parts of this story, and why this isn't a perfect happy ending for Syria ๐ธ๐พ but rather a bittersweet one. At least we can celebrate ๐ฅณ knowing that Assad is no longer in power to terrorize anyone ever again.
No doubt the big winner in all of this is Turkey ๐น๐ท. Turkey ๐น๐ท supported the rebels, Tahrir al-Sham is a Turkish-backed group ๐น๐ท, and many other Sunni Islamist groups ☪️ that make up the current Syrian opposition ๐ธ๐พ right now are backed by the Turks ๐น๐ท. So, by the rebels removing Assad from power and winning the civil war, Turkey ๐น๐ท's foreign policy interests in the Middle East at least (that rhymed) have been served. While Russia ๐ท๐บ and Iran ๐ฎ๐ท's influence in the Middle East is starting to wane, Turkey ๐น๐ท's influence is growing.
And if you know anything about Turkey ๐น๐ท, you'll know that's not necessarily a good thing as the country is being led by Recep Tayyip Erdoฤan, and Erdoฤan is a bit of a dictator himself. Very similar to Viktor Orbรกn in Hungary ๐ญ๐บ or Narendra Modi in India ๐ฎ๐ณ. But, this may lead to relations between Turkey ๐น๐ท and Russia ๐ท๐บ becoming strained, which is possibly the one silver lining in all this. The more countries that turn against Russia ๐ท๐บ the better. Israel ๐ฎ๐ฑ is also getting something out of this, as Assad was very hostile towards Israel ๐ฎ๐ฑ, and with him gone they have one less enemy to worry about.
They also invaded Syria ๐ธ๐พ, yeah that's right, they invaded Syria ๐ธ๐พ, taking full advantage of the chaos and power vacuum created by Assad's fall from power and occupying parts of southern Syria ๐ธ๐พ. I didn't know about this until I started writing about this. Right now, from what I've read on Wikipedia, it seems like this invasion is mostly just to secure the Golan Heights, which Israel ๐ฎ๐ฑ already controls, and to grab more Syrian territory ๐ธ๐พ within the Quneitra Governorate. They say that they're just creating a buffer zone, but the Israelis ๐ฎ๐ฑ are known liars, Benjamin Netanyahu is a liar, and they could easily be lying about this that they're just "creating a buffer zone." I wouldn't be surprised if they kept the territory they captured, and you shouldn't be surprised either. They did the same thing after they captured the Sinai peninsula during the Six Day War. They didn't relinquish the Sinai peninsula after they captured it, no, they kept it until 1982 two years after they signed the peace treaty with Egypt ๐ช๐ฌ in 1979. They've also conducted air strikes in Damascus and in other parts of Syria ๐ธ๐พ.
All those fears that the war in Gaza would spark a larger war in the Middle East have largely come true as the war has now expanded to Syria ๐ธ๐พ after expanding to Lebanon ๐ฑ๐ง a couple of months ago, and it seems like at the moment at least, Israel ๐ฎ๐ฑ is winning that war. Which isn't good for the Palestinians ๐ต๐ธ, or the Syrians ๐ธ๐พ, or any other Arab people, or for the stability of the Middle East ๐, but it's also not good for Iran ๐ฎ๐ท, which is a plus I guess ๐คท♂️. You take what you can get with these kind of things. Netanyahu really has no idea what he started, and has no way to stop it ๐คฆ♂️.
That brings us to the last question on everyone's mind following Assad's fall from power, and that's what will happen to Syria ๐ธ๐พ next? It is important to note that these were not the secular pro-democracy rebels that the US ๐บ๐ธ and many other Western countries rhetorically supported that defeated Assad and won the war. As I said before, it was the Islamist rebels ☪️, mainly Tahrir al-Sham, that led the charge against Assad in this recent offensive and won the day. So, it'll be them that shape the future of Syria ๐ธ๐พ, not the pro-democracy rebels who we were all rooting for and who we all wanted to win, but the US ๐บ๐ธ didn't support and kind of fizzled out as a result of the US ๐บ๐ธ not supporting them militarily or materially. Thanks, Obama, thanks, Trump ๐๐.
Because they're an Islamist group ☪️ that has ties to al-Qaeda and had its origins in al-Qaeda being a splinter group of sorts to that organization, people are worried that we may see something similar happen in Syria ๐ธ๐พ that happened in Afghanistan ๐ฆ๐ซ after the US-backed government ๐บ๐ธ there collapsed and have a theocratic regime be formed where a strict form of Sharia law is imposed and women ♀︎ are stripped of all their rights being forced to walk around covered head-to-toe, and being forced to walk around while being accompanied by a man ♂︎ and all that.
For the Syrian people's sake ๐ธ๐พ, I really do hope that doesn't happen and that Tahrir al-Sham and the other rebel groups have moderated their positions and that the secular forces within the opposition take hold, and that they allow Syria ๐ธ๐พ to have democracy instead of holding power for themselves. Maybe something like current-day Iraq ๐ฎ๐ถ, Iraq ๐ฎ๐ถ's not perfect, it still has a lot of problems but it is in a much better place than Syria ๐ธ๐พ is right now or has been under Assad and during the civil war. Even something similar to post-Gaddafi Libya ๐ฑ๐พ would still be preferable to what Syria ๐ธ๐พ had during the Assad years and what it has now in the devastation of the civil war. Of course, Libya ๐ฑ๐พ had a second civil war after Gaddafi was overthrown because there were two rival governments, but I'm talking after that civil war was over.
The worst case scenario would be something like a Taliban-type regime being established in Syria ๐ธ๐พ, but the other worst case scenario would be that the civil war continues or another one starts where the rebel groups start fighting amongst themselves for power now that their common enemy has been defeated. Just like what happened after the end of the Soviet-Afghan War ๐ฆ๐ซ☭, once the Soviets ☭ were gone, the Mujahideen broke apart and the rebel groups that made up the Mujahideen started fighting each other in what became known as the Afghan Civil War ๐ฆ๐ซ (or the Second Afghan Civil War ๐ฆ๐ซ as it's also known since there was more than one Afghan Civil War ๐ฆ๐ซ), a war that led to the Taliban taking control of the country for the first time.
Maybe, the rebels do form a relative secular and moderate government with perhaps a limited form of democracy, but they end up facing Israeli aggression ๐ฎ๐ฑ next in a new war for however long Netanyahu is in office and the world continues to let Israel ๐ฎ๐ฑ do whatever the hell it wants with no repercussions. It's hard to say what the future holds for Syria ๐ธ๐พ, we'll just have to wait and see, but right now, it doesn't look great. Like I said, this wasn't the perfect happy ending we all wanted to the Syrian Civil War ๐ธ๐พ, it is more of a bittersweet one.
—
Update (Sunday December 15, 2024):
๐ฎ๐ฑ๐ธ๐พ
(This is a screenshot of an article from BBC News that I found on Apple News talking about Israel ๐ฎ๐ฑ's plans to expand the Golan Heights settlements to the newly acquired territory that they’ve occupied in Syria ๐ธ๐พ, specifically in their Quneitra Governorate. Here is a link to the article itself.)
Yep, I called it, Israel ๐ฎ๐ฑ is indeed keeping the territory it seized from Syria ๐ธ๐พ after the fall of Assad. This shouldn't be a surprise to anyone, and yet, it will be to those who still think that Israel ๐ฎ๐ฑ is still capable of doing the right thing or that Israel ๐ฎ๐ฑ always has the best intentions with everything it does ๐.
(This is a map created by the BBC themselves showing the Syrian territory ๐ธ๐พ that Israel ๐ฎ๐ฑ currently occupies. The territory that they recently acquired were part of a UN buffer zone ๐บ๐ณ until Israel ๐ฎ๐ฑ moved in and took control of it, and made it clear that they have every intention of annexing that territory just like they did with the Golan Heights. I know that they haven't officially annexed it just like they haven't officially annexed the Golan Heights, but they're pretty much saying that they plan on occupying that territory indefinitely just like they've been occupying the Golan Heights indefinitely for 57 years since 1967 after the end of the Six Day War. It pretty much amounts to an annexation without actually saying it's an annexation and making it official.
That's how Israel ๐ฎ๐ฑ has expanded its territory since it came into existence in 1948, that's what they did with the Sinai peninsula until they were forced to give it back to Egypt ๐ช๐ฌ in 1982 after they signed a peace treaty with them in 1979. They didn't take the Russian approach ๐ท๐บ which is to occupy a territory, and then officially annex it after a sham referendum because they know that comes from with some stigma. People didn’t like it when Russia ๐ท๐บ annexed Crimea, and they didn't like it when Russia ๐ท๐บ annexed the Donbas region and other oblasts in the eastern part of Ukraine ๐บ๐ฆ. So, Israel ๐ฎ๐ฑ doesn't do that, instead they do what they've always done where they just occupy a territory indefinitely, placing it their de facto control and allowing them to build settlements there without actually saying that they've annexed it.)
I also found another article, this time from The Times and Sunday Times saying that Assad was literally indebted to Iran ๐ฎ๐ท, meaning he owed them $50 billion USD ๐ต in exchange for them protecting him. And with him being ousted, all that money ๐ต has gone up in flames ๐ฅ or "in smoke ๐จ" as the article says, and Iran ๐ฎ๐ท is pretty upset about it ๐คฌ. Will Iran ๐ฎ๐ท be aggressive and less forgiving to the new regime in Syria ๐ธ๐พ (whatever it maybe) and to the region as a whole now that they've lost all that money ๐ต that Assad owed them? Maybe.
Considering how they've behaved towards Israel ๐ฎ๐ฑ, I wouldn't be surprised if Iran ๐ฎ๐ท was more aggressive towards the new Syrian state ๐ธ๐พ whenever it's established and will lash out at other states too that it may blame for why Assad fell and why they lost all their money ๐ต as a result, such as the US ๐บ๐ธ and Turkey ๐น๐ท. I would say Israel ๐ฎ๐ฑ, but they're already mad at Israel ๐ฎ๐ฑ so this won't make them even more mad at Israel ๐ฎ๐ฑ than they already are.
I guess Assad was like Saddam where had accumulated millions or this case billions of dollars ๐ต of ill gotten gains and was stashing away for himself. Only Assad wasn't stashing it for himself, he was stashing it away to give to Iran ๐ฎ๐ท, one of his two biggest benefactors. Saddam was nicknamed "the Godfather" after the movie The Godfather because of all the money ๐ต he accumulated (according to the movie War Dogs), but what would Assad's nickname be? "The Goodfella" ๐คท♂️?
I also found another article on that same website talking about how Assad funded his regime with drug money ๐ต. He built a massive drug empire, a narco state if you will, to not only keep his regime afloat but also to fund the war effort against the various rebel factions that he was fighting against, and also probably to enrich himself and his family ๐ค. Some of that drug money ๐ต also probably going to Iran ๐ฎ๐ท as well since Assad was indebted to the regime there in Tehran. The drug he was mainly producing and selling was the drug known as Captagon which is an illegal drug that is banned in the US ๐บ๐ธ and has been banned there since the 1980s. He was producing several tons of this stuff inside of Syria ๐ธ๐พ, the rebels have discovered factories with thousands of pills, some of which were stashed in fake fruit and electronic devices.
After the drugs were produced in Syrian drug labs ๐ธ๐พ under the control of the regime, he would ship them to various countries in the Middle East and Europe with the help of drug traffickers. So, Assad was funding his regime with drug trafficking, that's something we already kind of knew. It was covered in The Equalizer 3, it was a large part of that movie's plot. We just didn't know the full extent of it until after Assad fell. It reminds me a lot of how North Korea ๐ฐ๐ต funds its regime and its military with money laundering ๐ต and other criminal activities due to massive international sanctions that have been imposed on it, or how the Taliban funded themselves with opium grown from the poppy fields in Afghanistan ๐ฆ๐ซ during the war against the US ๐บ๐ธ, NATO, and the US ๐บ๐ธ and NATO-backed Afghan government ๐ฆ๐ซ. You can go read both articles by clicking here and here.
(This is a screenshot of the article I found on The Times and Sunday Times talking about Assad's debt to the Iranian regime ๐ฎ๐ท on Apple News. It's on Apple News+ meaning it's behind a paywall, which means that I had to find this article on the Internet ๐ using my iPhone ๐ฑ and then having it sync with my laptop ๐ป so it would appear on the browser on my laptop ๐ป. They use the same browser, Firefox, so it worked.)
Comments
Post a Comment