China ๐จ๐ณ and Russia ๐ท๐บ Veto a US-backed UN Resolution ๐บ๐ธ๐บ๐ณ to Call for a Ceasefire in Gaza
I don't know if you've heard the news or not, but China ๐จ๐ณ and Russia ๐ท๐บ both vetoed a US-sponsored UN resolution ๐บ๐ธ๐บ๐ณ to call for an immediate ceasefire to the war in Gaza. This pisses me off because China ๐จ๐ณ and Russia ๐ท๐บ have both been publicly calling for a ceasefire in Gaza, and have condemned Israel ๐ฎ๐ฑ for most of the war. And they've criticized and complained about the US ๐บ๐ธ using its permanent member status in the UN Security Council ๐บ๐ณ to veto any resolution that called for an immediate ceasefire.
But, now that the US ๐บ๐ธ wants a ceasefire, all of a sudden, China ๐จ๐ณ and Russia ๐ท๐บ don't want one, and used their own veto power to veto the US ๐บ๐ธ's proposed resolution. Do you want a ceasefire or not? Do you want the war to end? If you do, then cut the bullshit, and just agree to the resolution. So what if it doesn't have everything you want in it? You want to the end the violence right? You want to stop the suffering? You want to stop the death? If the situation is really that dire, and it is, then just agree to the UN resolution ๐บ๐ณ now that everyone's on the same page that there should be a ceasefire and that the war should end as soon as possible.
I guess this is China ๐จ๐ณ and Russia ๐ท๐บ's retaliation against the US ๐บ๐ธ for vetoing their ceasefire resolution proposals, but still this is shameful. It's childish, and it's counterproductive. The Chinese ๐จ๐ณ and the Russians ๐ท๐บ should be ashamed of themselves for vetoing this resolution, but we all know they won't because they don't have any shame whatsoever. They're incapable of feeling shame for any of the bad things they do. When China ๐จ๐ณ and Russia ๐ท๐บ pull stunts like this, it shows me that they don't actually care about the things they purport to care about. All this did was show me that they don't actually want the war to end, and that they don't actually care about the Palestinians ๐ต๐ธ.
Because if you really cared about this stuff, and you wanted the war to end, and you wanted the Palestinians ๐ต๐ธ to get aid, then you would agree to the UN resolution ๐บ๐ณ that called for an end to the violence, that pushed for humanitarian aid for the Palestinians ๐ต๐ธ inside Gaza. It wouldn't matter if it was put forward by the US ๐บ๐ธ, in fact the fact that it was should make you want to support it even more because now everyone is on the same page about this issue, everyone wants a ceasefire, and there are no more obstacles, at least from the American side ๐บ๐ธ. But, no, the Chinese ๐จ๐ณ and the Russians ๐ท๐บ vetoed it because they didn't want to make the US ๐บ๐ธ look good.
That's not the official stated reason why the Chinese and Russian delegations ๐จ๐ณ๐ท๐บ vetoed that particular UN resolution ๐บ๐ณ, but it's what I'm speculating. Because before, they were fully on board with a ceasefire when the US ๐บ๐ธ wasn't on board, and they were more than willing to condemn the US ๐บ๐ธ for vetoing their proposed resolutions. But, now that the US ๐บ๐ธ wants a ceasefire too, all of a sudden, they don't want it because they don't want to make the US ๐บ๐ธ look good, and they don't want to give the US ๐บ๐ธ a win.
It's the same mindset, the same mentality that the Republicans had when they decided to kill that bipartisan border security bill that was drafted by Republicans, and had everything that the Republicans could ever want when it comes to the US-Mexico border ๐บ๐ธ๐ฒ๐ฝ. It was even backed by the National Border Patrol Council, which is a labor union for border patrol agents. It was the strongest border security bill ever drafted, and brought forward to the US Congress ๐บ๐ธ. But, the Republicans killed it, they killed their dream bill all because Donald Trump didn't want the border to be secured because it would make Biden look good, and Trump wants to run on the border as a campaign issue.
It's that same sort of childish and cynical mentality of "I want to complain or fear-monger about this issue, but I don't actually want to solve it, and I certainly don't want to solve it on my opponent's terms because I don't want to make them look good. I'll say it's a crisis, and it needs to be solved right away, but when the other side puts forward a solution, I won't agree to it because they came up with it and I didn't, and I want to take credit for solving it. Or rather, I would rather not solve, and just have it remain this issue that I can use as political theater and as way to demonize the other side." That's all China ๐จ๐ณ and Russia ๐ท๐บ are doing here.
They're pretending to care about the Palestinian issue ๐ต๐ธ, and they're pretending to want a ceasefire in Gaza, but when they're given a golden opportunity to support a UN resolution ๐บ๐ณ that would put more pressure on Israel ๐ฎ๐ฑ to end their military operations inside Gaza, and enter ceasefire talks with Hamas, as well as provide aid to the starving Palestinians ๐ต๐ธ, and free the remaining Israeli hostages ๐ฎ๐ฑ from Hamas's captivity, they vote against it because that resolution was proposed by the US ๐บ๐ธ, their mutual chosen geopolitical rival.
They don't actually want to solve the issue, they don't actually want the war to end, and they don't actually want this conflict overall to be resolved peacefully. They want it to remain an issue so that they can complain about it, morally grandstand and pretend to be the good guys and pretend to be on the moral high ground, and make the US ๐บ๐ธ look bad. They don't actually care about the Palestinians ๐ต๐ธ at all. They'd drop the Palestinians ๐ต๐ธ as soon as they were given the opportunity to.
Like, if Israel ๐ฎ๐ฑ all of a sudden turned against the US ๐บ๐ธ and decided to side with both China ๐จ๐ณ and Russia ๐ท๐บ, they'd both welcome Israel ๐ฎ๐ฑ with open arms, and immediately drop the Palestinians ๐ต๐ธ, and let the Israelis ๐ฎ๐ฑ do whatever they want with them. They'd be even more lenient on Israel ๐ฎ๐ฑ when it comes to human rights. They'd let Israel ๐ฎ๐ฑ expand the settlements (China ๐จ๐ณ might even decide to invest in those settlements, and build property of their own that they could profit off of ๐ค), or even perhaps fully annex both the Gaza Strip and the West Bank, and deport the Palestinians ๐ต๐ธ, forcing them all of their land, and effectively ethnically cleansing the two areas.
But, because Israel ๐ฎ๐ฑ is still a US ally ๐บ๐ธ, they condemn Israel ๐ฎ๐ฑ and they cynically pretend to care about the Palestinians' ๐ต๐ธ well being. And they managed to dupe a lot of people into believing that they do actually care. What makes these people believe that China ๐จ๐ณ and Russia ๐ท๐บ value human life in any way? Both of these countries and governments have shown that they don't value human life at all.
Putin's Russia ๐ท๐บ certainly doesn't value human life. Xi's China ๐จ๐ณ has never valued human life, at least, not the lives of certain groups of humans (*cough* the Uyghurs *cough*). In fact, the People's Republic of China ๐จ๐ณ (PRC) hasn't valued human life for its entire history. This is the same regime that caused one of the worst famines in history, this is the same regime that massacred protesters for daring to ask for a little bit of reform. This is the same regime that subjugated and oppressed ethnic minorities that they didn't like, that they perceived a threat to their rule.
This is the same regime that has supported authoritarian and genocidal regimes guilty of human rights violations around the world, and this is the same regime that currently has its population under mass surveillance and jails political dissents all the time. These are the last two countries should be talking about human rights, and these are the last two countries that you should believe when they say that care about the suffering of another group of people in a country thousands of miles away from them.
It's behavior like this why the Israeli-Palestinian conflict ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐ต๐ธ never gets resolved, and why more Israelis ๐ฎ๐ฑ and Palestinians ๐ต๐ธ continue to suffer and die. More so Palestinians ๐ต๐ธ than Israelis ๐ฎ๐ฑ, but still. If you're pro-Palestinian ๐ต๐ธ, and you care about the people in Gaza, then you shouldn't support China ๐จ๐ณ and/or Russia ๐ท๐บ. They are not on your side.
They're using this issue for their own selfish and cynical gain, they're using it as a geopolitical chess piece ♟️ to use against the United States ๐บ๐ธ to score brownie points with the Arab world and the entire Global South as whole. If Israel ๐ฎ๐ฑ stopped being a US ally ๐บ๐ธ, and switched over to being a Chinese and/or Russian ally ๐จ๐ณ๐ท๐บ, you'd all of a sudden stop hearing about the Palestinian issue ๐ต๐ธ from the Chinese ๐จ๐ณ and the Russians ๐ท๐บ.
If this whole issue surrounding the current in Gaza has taught us anything, it's further prove that the permanent membership system in the UN Security Council ๐บ๐ณ is outdated, and that there should no longer be any permanent members on the UN Security Council ๐บ๐ณ. Not the US ๐บ๐ธ, not the UK ๐ฌ๐ง, not France ๐ซ๐ท, not China ๐จ๐ณ, and not Russia ๐ท๐บ. None of these countries deserve to have permanent seats at the Security Council. All of the seats in the Security Council should be changed and appointed or voted on, or whatever. I don't know how the UN ๐บ๐ณ selects members for the Security Council, but however they do it, they should do it for all the seats, and there should be no more permanent seats.
Pretty much all of the permanent members of the Security Council have abused their permanent member status and abused their veto power at one time or another to advance their own interests. As a result, the UN Security Council ๐บ๐ณ is unproductive and weak, and is pretty much ineffective at resolving any crisis around the world. So, it's time to get rid of this permanent membership system/status, and make every seat in the UN Security Council ๐บ๐ณ up for grabs.
Make it so that countries have to earn their spot on the Security Council. If they violate human rights, or commit acts of aggression, or support those who do, then they shouldn't be allowed on the Security Council. Same goes for the Human Rights Council, if any member violates human rights or supports another member who did, they shouldn't be allowed to be on the Human Rights Council. There is no reason why countries like Iran ๐ฎ๐ท should be on the Human Rights Council.
Would any of this make the UN ๐บ๐ณ better and more effective? I really don't know. I would hope so, given that the UN ๐บ๐ณ is suppose to champion world peace, cooperation between nations, and protect and preserve human right among other things, and we wouldn't want anything that goes against those principles, but it's really hard to say. But, it certainly be a step in the right direction. It would put us in a better path than the one we are in now with how the UN ๐บ๐ณ currently works.
—
Here's the Associated Press video I saw showing that Russia ๐ท๐บ and China ๐จ๐ณ vetoed the US-sponsored UN Security Council Resolution ๐บ๐ณ:
—
Update (Monday March 25, 2024):
๐บ๐ณ๐ท๐บ๐จ๐ณ๐บ๐ธ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐ต๐ธ
This just in the UN ๐บ๐ณ passed a resolution calling for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza, with a 14-0 vote. 14 votes for, 0 votes again, and 1 abstention. The abstention came from the United States ๐บ๐ธ. They did not use their veto power to veto the resolution, and just chose to abstain. This could be read as the US ๐บ๐ธ not necessarily agreeing with everything that's in the resolution, but deciding to not stand in the way of it and let it pass because they recognize the need for an immediate ceasefire in the Gaza war.
I would say at this point, everyone agrees that there should be a ceasefire and an immediate stop to the fighting. It's just that everyone disagrees on what the terms of the ceasefire should be, and how long it should last. Should it be just a temporary pause, or should be a permanent stop to the fighting and lead to peace talks? That's kind of the main disagreement. The US ๐บ๐ธ wants a ceasefire too, but the two stipulations that they've wanted in the UN Resolution ๐บ๐ณ is that there would be a pathway for the last remaining Israeli hostages ๐ฎ๐ฑ be released and to condemn Hamas for the October 7 attack which started the war in the first place. Given the abstention, I assume that the US ๐บ๐ธ didn't get everything they wanted.
But, they chose to abstain instead of vote against it or veto it because they see that an immediate ceasefire is necessary, and that situation on the ground in Gaza is becoming more dire. To veto or vote against would be a really bad look for the US ๐บ๐ธ, especially when more news that has come out confirming that Israel ๐ฎ๐ฑ is indeed committing war crimes inside Gaza.
So, we now have video evidence to show that Israel ๐ฎ๐ฑ is committing war crimes, and not abiding by the rules of warfare. There is no more doubt that Israel ๐ฎ๐ฑ is doing bad stuff inside Gaza, beyond just the attempt to cause a famine in the Palestinian population ๐ต๐ธ. The US ๐บ๐ธ can no ignore this, or pretend it's not happening, and it cannot stand by this anymore without hurting its own reputation. So, the pressure is mounting at home and abroad for the Biden administration to do something, and put more pressure on Israel ๐ฎ๐ฑ to stop its military operations, and enter some sort of peace talks, and allow humanitarian aid to get to the Palestinians ๐ต๐ธ inside Gaza. That's kind of the reason why I think the US delegation ๐บ๐ธ in the UN Security Council ๐บ๐ณ chose abstain, and allow the resolution to pass, despite them not agreeing with everything in it. The Americans ๐บ๐ธ are finally starting to wake up to the fact that Israel ๐ฎ๐ฑ has to be stopped.
But, the part that really got me was the end of this video from AP, the Associated Press, showing the moment when the resolution passes, and everyone in the Security Council claps ๐ for having passed it. When I saw the Russian and the Chinese delegations ๐ท๐บ๐จ๐ณ clapping ๐, I was like, "look at these clowns ๐คก, clapping ๐ and congratulating themselves. You vetoed that other UN Resolution ๐บ๐ณ that the US ๐บ๐ธ proposed to call for a ceasefire in Gaza! Don't sit there, and clap ๐ and pat yourselves on the back. You could have voted for that other resolution, but you didn't."
As I said before in the main text, the Chinese ๐จ๐ณ and the Russians ๐ท๐บ are only doing this to score geopolitical points against the US ๐บ๐ธ. They don't actually care about the Palestinians ๐ต๐ธ, they just know that this is an issue that's tough for the US ๐บ๐ธ, and that they could use to try to hurt the US ๐บ๐ธ's image aboard for not standing by in solidarity with an oppressed people, and standing with the country that's stealing their land, killing them, and starving them to death.
If the political situation and balance of power were to change in the Middle East, and Israel ๐ฎ๐ฑ were to switch sides, the Palestinian issue ๐ต๐ธ would all of a sudden no longer be a concern to the Russians ๐ท๐บ and the Chinese ๐จ๐ณ. Because all know that the Russians ๐ท๐บ and the Chinese ๐จ๐ณ are perfectly fine with one of their allies committing human rights abuses, or committing war crimes. Russia ๐ท๐บ is definitely not to talk considering they're still fighting a war with Ukraine ๐บ๐ฆ where they've perpetuated numerous war crimes and are basically committing a genocide against the Ukrainians ๐บ๐ฆ, and have further ambitions to conquer the other countries in the former Soviet Union ☭ and the former Warsaw Pact. Plus, all the stuff they've done in Syria ๐ธ๐พ, and throughout Africa with the Wagner Group.
China ๐จ๐ณ is also not one to talk. They're in no position to criticize Israel ๐ฎ๐ฑ or accuse Israel ๐ฎ๐ฑ of committing a genocide, since the Chinese ๐จ๐ณ themselves committed a genocide against a Muslim minority ☪️ within their own borders too, the Uyghurs. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) ๐จ๐ณ☭ may try to pretend that it didn't happen, and everything's fine now in Xinjiang, and the Uyghurs are perfectly happy, but we know that they did commit a genocide, that they did put the Uyghurs into concentration camps, and we should never let them live that down. I mean, both China ๐จ๐ณ and Russia ๐ท๐บ support the Taliban, and have unofficial diplomatic relations with their government, the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan, which we all know is a bastion of human rights ๐. And China ๐จ๐ณ gets mad at the US ๐บ๐ธ for having unofficial diplomatic relations with Taiwan ๐น๐ผ ๐.
This is all for show, it's all a game, it's all about trying to gain greater influence within a specific region of the world that the US ๐บ๐ธ has been dominant in for half a century. It's not really about human rights, or about humanitarianism, or about holding a specific government accountable for its actions. But, I guess, as long as there is a ceasefire in Gaza and the war finally comes to an end, it'll all be worth it. Even, if China ๐จ๐ณ and Russia ๐ท๐บ are supporting a ceasefire and supporting the Palestinian cause ๐ต๐ธ for all the wrong reasons. It's up to the US ๐บ๐ธ to steer this thing in the right direction.
—
This is an MSNBC video reporting on the leaked IDF drone footage showing Israeli war crimes ๐ฎ๐ฑ against Palestinian civilians ๐ต๐ธ inside Gaza:
Comments
Post a Comment